IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)

Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 February 2018 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D17812DFDB; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:54:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HLIrjJr_HmjN; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl0-x241.google.com (mail-pl0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3973C12DB6E; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 04:54:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl0-x241.google.com with SMTP id q17so1187934pll.1; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 04:54:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JWs185Kk98Xgf2lg8HhUR2+2IE3Pt/jd4SkHpVRNSvw=; b=T6UkFr4Kkber7gJc7w9qhUgOVuh3Y91MIZLmPG/gkVLjI1f8PrgPw9d0iMi5v7gfsF WlZTL9fOW50J36+tAyDMV/KQmUmNB36Kyq+l3FZy2SFzTubRnkvicygSIINEKVzX+vnr rF/J3i/0qoxonm+w+P8degCIBUiphgC6jyhyrClM02BenrtUPukWzOSwAFt9CiTkMkjU aivkszpG/q/bc6f1rFMqFHyrbo4puZNSds+c+lYxIZ+ngE24b7yJ0gtlMuMlX4ybN2s1 uA4nuUXEH9LZUP7omWg3e74bUk88APLKpuda0gP/isOE1FBS1BR/VP0+FtSw98FpbGAJ YOMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JWs185Kk98Xgf2lg8HhUR2+2IE3Pt/jd4SkHpVRNSvw=; b=WqH46fcqDJaTL05yeTaNCBIGK3dtChWhD5/4uTuVq9ty3MGtMIjV4Z8opmUTSt6H9U Vap5IRb9TEbC9f4wq3f3UM9GwMjQgxPV4H+GoawhNtIliRkzpTXl3w9m8HcKtvyVuoyX IaTTTFgxOQTHdrQ+8Rrx/Vnyut2Cw2PGmcP30edgTqXocZAbaKgVCMCk7OYtVeDpXtsu 7IxXQy5J/Q+/r4RtaV9ReQTDyxg3ebqsKxzOoC5XnbLDA+1hX7eMMXVS3L3nqS2Etsrr vODNZHEje8Nw4w3oI4zol7U/FqdlJjSSCdsdmxrxtB0hOdBP/ffkaHIOfMNZAWadlftq 0Ydg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBxZxFmS2XJs6sBBlqWklcXD4wGNf+iGWwM5rZqWr5cicRnUpBO TbicQidil9DUl2+8+ZS5Nxc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225JKOdbupjXH/QXzoiSrjQSplFmN7A+U1KO1wx/874UYM/hUKmSoOh5pZ4juJb6eJ4p3a36ow==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:34f:: with SMTP id 73-v6mr2352595pld.122.1517921676707; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 04:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:8b03:d12c:bc4b:2b3d:aeae:c471? ([2601:646:8b03:d12c:bc4b:2b3d:aeae:c471]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w7sm21830470pfb.125.2018.02.06.04.54.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Feb 2018 04:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <151566303970.12739.2150770765764492742.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 04:54:32 -0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tinatsou6@gmail.com, spring@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org, bruno.decraene@orange.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FAADC677-CE13-4A78-9CF3-9B6D29C003F3@gmail.com>
References: <151566303970.12739.2150770765764492742.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/7p4HH_DR0A8cb_Ch_HjG5-eLU6c>
Subject: Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 12:54:40 -0000

Thanks Beniot for the comments.

Please see inline [Gaurav]

> On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> OPS DIR review from Tina:
> 
> I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an
> informational document.
> 
> Some nits:
> 
> 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277)
> 
> Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session
> 
> should be
> 
> Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session
[Gaurav] Will address in next revision.
> 
> 7.  Addressing the open problems
> 
> the same could be re-used in context of
>   other domains as well
> 
> A period is missing in the end.
> 
[Gaurav] ACK.

> Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components?
[Gaurav]  Yes in this context.
> 
> Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it would
> be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking intra-domain
> topology and policy.
> 
> Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB in
> FD.io VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP ?
> [Gaurav] Apologies, which specific feature?

Cheers,

Gaurav
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email