Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)
Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> Wed, 14 February 2018 23:48 UTC
Return-Path: <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407ED126DFB; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UYOhykoXD8Rl; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3447126C22; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id w10so8427351ote.13; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MHcHtGfnV9LvmpqgGMXk5TTbZK7sko7dlRXFaqr5B+U=; b=YULGYb6bB8B+APeoAxqfzuBYSIpBvmPksufckz8jhX8HYaso0lU39QywcQBNRyCHX7 6ObeNghW4QIruSos0DPVmXbnaF7abIxEvPn6E7eOyQ6fLv4mBB0Z3CUhpWoDzvkuxagJ My/uqWccw7br8DRpUNAvgSsQnbFeBHoE7b5QGHoQjv9YmtAx2zVHnuENy0VF7Z4xIl+q hr2sKbpQeBO2Ngm0oi4nTdxFZIG8wndxvIegkQHA+tKOyKJtY/Poab8YcW/uFN5+imYi vi6BYc7e7OICtYFtTl/s4gAawkZf9ZgLBG0Wsj9kQdae8nBXXVRZZiJiT33UdjjIw7t3 2KBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MHcHtGfnV9LvmpqgGMXk5TTbZK7sko7dlRXFaqr5B+U=; b=q62t187ax2VecnhcWbxkvoJKyc6boDzy0TFfT4xsBRVJNbCvPwYJzL3yfAI/IraYl/ IimDQXrqWz5cQHwZisfphspg05Hjd3FXvqlCObZHZ6+M4nlDSLkB0g5YIHYXastHb3ia 3bTJ3FeUI7VuLwoc56uU4hHLfPskzfQyDM9TdjArXEOIOpQNP2KkSkZ9tN55p28tPlkk eOR/KP0QkbHKew2R65ynC4XDNI/0PI1wP8GSEk3FhzMWwpt3u0bxfW4T1Y3x50iqYp8Y vlOR4Gwbx4yRjxz/E16helkxsrGdpcr9uQC3Z/9NDsg9nedVq1TbA7FzW6zFLQofUq7N CLPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBU07GW6K9p0APrnZT7Uvot3k9H/dTyiz1Q6Rv/UTz/7Vf99iiX Lzg98mTAJYlbIRwSNMpRKwSEepkCfFmIRGM9Wzo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224jOfwMIGl3xFFIwr4D/g3rO3788Iau/BwTAIECA/3MJ71rgz3TjQNM/klpYeyjczaEpMKn94P3puWwxGwYV6Y=
X-Received: by 10.157.24.103 with SMTP id t36mr545566ott.281.1518652091924; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <151566303970.12739.2150770765764492742.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FAADC677-CE13-4A78-9CF3-9B6D29C003F3@gmail.com> <CAMS-Z8BUBBz=rovG2G_hyGRb1EKC5MY3QC5pCVPqnqUq1KpDcw@mail.gmail.com> <0471BC25-9546-4454-BCA2-3FA473B81C06@gmail.com> <E68648F6-21A6-4441-BC1D-609AF8B0A1FD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E68648F6-21A6-4441-BC1D-609AF8B0A1FD@cisco.com>
From: Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:48:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMS-Z8BbaNJaAN-DumECwCzR0i=muF38crXDmV0RvP-EP8uyDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tina Tsou <tina.tsou@arm.com>, "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142d9ba7a06d4056534be78"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/0WrqWcPYkBbQMrQetMstRUjQzo0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:14:34 -0800
Subject: Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:48:15 -0000
Dear Pablo, Thanks for the update. I will keep an eye on the CSIT process. On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:21 PM Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) < pcamaril@cisco.com> wrote: > Hello Tina, > > > > VPP has data-plane support for SR both over MPLS[1] and IPv6 [2]. > > Regarding support for BGP-Prefix-SID, well since VPP does not have a > routing stack, it does not support BGP at all. That said, I’m well aware of > several ongoing opensource projects that are trying to get a control plane > to VPP where the BGP-Prefix-SID most likely will be introduced. > > > > The CSIT project is related to automated performance measurement for VPP. > I’m working with the CSIT team to get all the SR code tested in CSIT. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Cheers, > > Pablo. > > > > [1]. https://docs.fd.io/vpp/18.04/srmpls_doc.html > > [2]. https://docs.fd.io/vpp/18.04/srv6_doc.html > > > > *From: *Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> > *Date: *Monday, 12 February 2018 at 18:48 > *To: *Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> > *Cc: *"Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG < > iesg@ietf.org>, Tina Tsou <tina.tsou@arm.com>, Alvaro Retana < > aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, " > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org" < > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" < > spring@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, > "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com> > *Subject: *Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT) > > > > Tina, > > > > I am adding Pablo. He will respond to below comment. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Gaurav > > > > On Feb 6, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Gaurav, > > > > Please scroll down to see the reply in line. > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:54 AM Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Beniot for the comments. > > Please see inline [Gaurav] > > > On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > OPS DIR review from Tina: > > > > I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an > > informational document. > > > > Some nits: > > > > 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277) > > > > Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session > > > > should be > > > > Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session > [Gaurav] Will address in next revision. > > > > 7. Addressing the open problems > > > > the same could be re-used in context of > > other domains as well > > > > A period is missing in the end. > > > [Gaurav] ACK. > > > Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components? > [Gaurav] Yes in this context. > > > > Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it > would > > be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking > intra-domain > > topology and policy. > > > > Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB > in > > FD.io VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP ? > > [Gaurav] Apologies, which specific feature? > > I meant the technology described by this document. > > > > At FD.io <http://fd.io/> CSIT TOI meeting now, see segment routing is on > the list, but cannot find more detail whether msdc is included. > > > Cheers, > > Gaurav > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spring mailing list > > spring@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > -- > > Thank you, Tina > > > > -- Thank you, Tina
- [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ie… Benoit Claise
- Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Tina Tsou
- Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Tina Tsou