Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)

Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> Wed, 14 February 2018 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407ED126DFB; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UYOhykoXD8Rl; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3447126C22; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id w10so8427351ote.13; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MHcHtGfnV9LvmpqgGMXk5TTbZK7sko7dlRXFaqr5B+U=; b=YULGYb6bB8B+APeoAxqfzuBYSIpBvmPksufckz8jhX8HYaso0lU39QywcQBNRyCHX7 6ObeNghW4QIruSos0DPVmXbnaF7abIxEvPn6E7eOyQ6fLv4mBB0Z3CUhpWoDzvkuxagJ My/uqWccw7br8DRpUNAvgSsQnbFeBHoE7b5QGHoQjv9YmtAx2zVHnuENy0VF7Z4xIl+q hr2sKbpQeBO2Ngm0oi4nTdxFZIG8wndxvIegkQHA+tKOyKJtY/Poab8YcW/uFN5+imYi vi6BYc7e7OICtYFtTl/s4gAawkZf9ZgLBG0Wsj9kQdae8nBXXVRZZiJiT33UdjjIw7t3 2KBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MHcHtGfnV9LvmpqgGMXk5TTbZK7sko7dlRXFaqr5B+U=; b=q62t187ax2VecnhcWbxkvoJKyc6boDzy0TFfT4xsBRVJNbCvPwYJzL3yfAI/IraYl/ IimDQXrqWz5cQHwZisfphspg05Hjd3FXvqlCObZHZ6+M4nlDSLkB0g5YIHYXastHb3ia 3bTJ3FeUI7VuLwoc56uU4hHLfPskzfQyDM9TdjArXEOIOpQNP2KkSkZ9tN55p28tPlkk eOR/KP0QkbHKew2R65ynC4XDNI/0PI1wP8GSEk3FhzMWwpt3u0bxfW4T1Y3x50iqYp8Y vlOR4Gwbx4yRjxz/E16helkxsrGdpcr9uQC3Z/9NDsg9nedVq1TbA7FzW6zFLQofUq7N CLPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBU07GW6K9p0APrnZT7Uvot3k9H/dTyiz1Q6Rv/UTz/7Vf99iiX Lzg98mTAJYlbIRwSNMpRKwSEepkCfFmIRGM9Wzo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224jOfwMIGl3xFFIwr4D/g3rO3788Iau/BwTAIECA/3MJ71rgz3TjQNM/klpYeyjczaEpMKn94P3puWwxGwYV6Y=
X-Received: by 10.157.24.103 with SMTP id t36mr545566ott.281.1518652091924; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:48:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <151566303970.12739.2150770765764492742.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FAADC677-CE13-4A78-9CF3-9B6D29C003F3@gmail.com> <CAMS-Z8BUBBz=rovG2G_hyGRb1EKC5MY3QC5pCVPqnqUq1KpDcw@mail.gmail.com> <0471BC25-9546-4454-BCA2-3FA473B81C06@gmail.com> <E68648F6-21A6-4441-BC1D-609AF8B0A1FD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E68648F6-21A6-4441-BC1D-609AF8B0A1FD@cisco.com>
From: Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:48:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMS-Z8BbaNJaAN-DumECwCzR0i=muF38crXDmV0RvP-EP8uyDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tina Tsou <tina.tsou@arm.com>, "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142d9ba7a06d4056534be78"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/0WrqWcPYkBbQMrQetMstRUjQzo0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:14:34 -0800
Subject: Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:48:15 -0000

Dear Pablo,

Thanks for the update.

I will keep an eye on the CSIT process.

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:21 PM Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <
pcamaril@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hello Tina,
>
>
>
> VPP has data-plane support for SR both over MPLS[1] and IPv6 [2].
>
> Regarding support for BGP-Prefix-SID, well since VPP does not have a
> routing stack, it does not support BGP at all. That said, I’m well aware of
> several ongoing opensource projects that are trying to get a control plane
> to VPP where the BGP-Prefix-SID most likely will be introduced.
>
>
>
> The CSIT project is related to automated performance measurement for VPP.
> I’m working with the CSIT team to get all the SR code tested in CSIT.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pablo.
>
>
>
> [1]. https://docs.fd.io/vpp/18.04/srmpls_doc.html
>
> [2]. https://docs.fd.io/vpp/18.04/srv6_doc.html
>
>
>
> *From: *Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 12 February 2018 at 18:48
> *To: *Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <
> iesg@ietf.org>, Tina Tsou <tina.tsou@arm.com>, Alvaro Retana <
> aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <
> spring@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>,
> "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
> Tina,
>
>
>
> I am adding Pablo. He will respond to below comment.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Gaurav
>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Gaurav,
>
>
>
> Please scroll down to see the reply in line.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:54 AM Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Beniot for the comments.
>
> Please see inline [Gaurav]
>
> > On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > OPS DIR review from Tina:
> >
> > I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an
> > informational document.
> >
> > Some nits:
> >
> > 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277)
> >
> > Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session
> >
> > should be
> >
> > Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session
> [Gaurav] Will address in next revision.
> >
> > 7.  Addressing the open problems
> >
> > the same could be re-used in context of
> >   other domains as well
> >
> > A period is missing in the end.
> >
> [Gaurav] ACK.
>
> > Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components?
> [Gaurav]  Yes in this context.
> >
> > Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it
> would
> > be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking
> intra-domain
> > topology and policy.
> >
> > Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB
> in
> > FD.io VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP ?
> > [Gaurav] Apologies, which specific feature?
>
> I meant the technology described by this document.
>
>
>
> At FD.io <http://fd.io/> CSIT TOI meeting now, see segment routing is on
> the list, but cannot find more detail whether msdc is included.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gaurav
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > spring@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
> --
>
> Thank you, Tina
>
>
>
> --
Thank you, Tina