Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)

Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 February 2018 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA6D12D864; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8fmfx0rvTeN9; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D0FE126E3A; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id l24so1937870pgc.5; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Diq2YxwzDPovWaOJiR36MU1G8nL25972DkQ/Kmc6qdA=; b=AMYQDyvjJXM8Lj1KIKv9VyCNLds/rY4cfFZW+dU8ZIfYHD8k+9DymXeKpjjMaGbhaA WQqkm7AUuMYYFlIn4clh1ZlbRHP+rZkBQJ3MhoPZgLAQHoXoyTSwn62ugojtkyluuUgB TWiJIvRF2sXZ5wItZQyBFsDHXBFfCFlvll4oReK59MlUwYPFkLqN3LqCzeNh05kQ4zPB x/9j1bwY7/Dene7EPt7CFWHJwRDP3og8UVHsuTvX+siB8dRBY7amF4QsRgKjBfAVaYGt 7OmqvnzR/Pv8xBTS/Y1Tqr+gTM+O1Qcvb2i7xEeWngbew76tSuaY6DiHVL2RBRVyAJe+ ubyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Diq2YxwzDPovWaOJiR36MU1G8nL25972DkQ/Kmc6qdA=; b=W3/yLXaXE+7ALX6ovjTmRVdn1Mjz5l2sFZeoZ3nBL8lf0aV1bF3uvL+QPzTBcOtZ3i jzJp+N1/rBMyPLScWvC3G2BFld8zJtRu1K+7dCm2kOLI9Wt8q/g4ahikFK7/szU76LVw l/2Hmn2ropy75QAsRyYNkNwcJRS+4IX8MOdfVEi+JRNdPD+3evL/Xdwr2l6QySjqwtJu zgFd3zI7Ja7kdtXPySEVgv1xvJJjOOp/Fu4zECYGS7YgCX5bXot2cQykRsXwVocfR8M/ tgahJhiPkMA/imhDQxv98ru1ImrQOUaYZkvTR2/PK4L55lDh2UM2s8HXxxImRZwwx0CM aAjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBB5wo+HZL2lnGzhC3ZpZAGd+AAEaqZmMBk67pavIRrxw/W1ufN pygRUZmnxIHTr8yyJn3n2+I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227XHlKtI7rDOc//O+FVWfX5H26qHea1+ZcEfGsRid/lR6OKUWWGJey2+OkygIyAwo/QuxhDlQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.8.141 with SMTP id 13mr12498177pfi.213.1518457723713; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:119:5003:20c:cbbe:c459:e3c8:5921? ([2620:119:5003:20c:cbbe:c459:e3c8:5921]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm28861498pfl.160.2018.02.12.09.48.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <0471BC25-9546-4454-BCA2-3FA473B81C06@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_01B692A6-F398-45CD-B343-8AA95FA07815"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:48:41 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAMS-Z8BUBBz=rovG2G_hyGRb1EKC5MY3QC5pCVPqnqUq1KpDcw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tina Tsou <tina.tsou@arm.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
To: Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
References: <151566303970.12739.2150770765764492742.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FAADC677-CE13-4A78-9CF3-9B6D29C003F3@gmail.com> <CAMS-Z8BUBBz=rovG2G_hyGRb1EKC5MY3QC5pCVPqnqUq1KpDcw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/jtsYSBQ3jJxPPvqGIa-gLtKY6DU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:15:32 -0800
Subject: Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:48:46 -0000

Tina,

I am adding Pablo. He will respond to below comment.

Cheers,

Gaurav

> On Feb 6, 2018, at 7:33 AM, Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Gaurav,
> 
> Please scroll down to see the reply in line.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:54 AM Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks Beniot for the comments.
> 
> Please see inline [Gaurav]
> 
> > On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html>
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/>
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > OPS DIR review from Tina:
> >
> > I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an
> > informational document.
> >
> > Some nits:
> >
> > 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277)
> >
> > Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session
> >
> > should be
> >
> > Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session
> [Gaurav] Will address in next revision.
> >
> > 7.  Addressing the open problems
> >
> > the same could be re-used in context of
> >   other domains as well
> >
> > A period is missing in the end.
> >
> [Gaurav] ACK.
> 
> > Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components?
> [Gaurav]  Yes in this context.
> >
> > Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it would
> > be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking intra-domain
> > topology and policy.
> >
> > Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB in
> > FD.io VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP <https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP> ?
> > [Gaurav] Apologies, which specific feature?
> I meant the technology described by this document.
> 
> At FD.io <http://fd.io/> CSIT TOI meeting now, see segment routing is on the list, but cannot find more detail whether msdc is included.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gaurav
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > spring@ietf.org <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>
> 
> -- 
> Thank you, Tina