Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Tue, 19 June 2018 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BB5130F30 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZ8J71j8GKVD for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3999C130EE1 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id n5-v6so21273987wmc.5 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=rAU90khRcHu6I3D7JPbBtmmOTT4jge2bUisdNjHgcmE=; b=OuAIKoZs8SibQeCr5QKNbjK8dRJ5jdJ4TtkVSmKh+9qzGi0S8MgrhpRqYGgo/gCvJH LasNSuEK/iyixtZFLYZbGnBzC7KRfbOFvr0X9QoHW6+atr6uadWG6sGg/fhBPxsKOd8P Uxj/S4F8tOaVbIWk5r8QVDis+K1a0N3OU3RgwIS1+Z0s4HLRlo5yKD5HG6Jp5HV9yS+/ 6by8a8JtidwjlrauTdLS1e6DW/865oDuUWY57T1lF/BbNwdzpYSZa0+k9du9ZMKD6qPZ oC1PCYYZGeca8IfXbh2g22ncTSi548bDF62Dgm203YUUsJFzMI5/2GvSEh4fnFGOF2nz t5JQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=rAU90khRcHu6I3D7JPbBtmmOTT4jge2bUisdNjHgcmE=; b=g6povHVh7aSXdUEl3YuashXF473mNt3xGKzSK+ZT7Kk287B+8ZV0Q43FAjlut5x/+R cQMrLbmGXs8s0LFcdzcPCSv7jnw0A/wwgoikHRXzbbp8x7OIG1ikzTtedVJihhIhwMm0 lzp4dIi9/A9ujKN4/MGls5bpTQy3QSP/DWXbsJG1G0eUmiBymxKEC8WdzvzCJZ8BzeDI l0MLP+WdFP+pNYgsdLTX3pLVFf5mbnFc2Tna1lF8Dn2N4ibfiHE4tB/XeRHI1ISSJN7+ a8aqgYWmNLRZl1aZgOcrWO7ytEBSbzl66dWWsk7MPYarg/8rfjnsU5JswfO7AsV24OKp kxYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2cNxbdodhIc6MxBurkhN+ysei14yl48bdcnJXZuxE7pP2xc+2I XzUcF48zYm/LvOAfZKuofcBvIit+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK0PVCRcKIKcqgTC1eHaLwbkv9kAzBencKSuhND+2jq1ApWl+JVUATcL4f48suXGKLqzN1SpQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c208:: with SMTP id s8-v6mr11842793wmf.29.1529407138475; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11-v6sm17244461wrs.85.2018.06.19.04.18.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: Rob Shakir <robjs=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
References: <CAHd-QWt+nmQz_R7kE2oeHa2cD88+ndSkpiv56WSFJfHH3PzxRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bac92e67-ef32-8a4a-1f55-a0d43d5004ae@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:18:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHd-QWt+nmQz_R7kE2oeHa2cD88+ndSkpiv56WSFJfHH3PzxRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0982AC31E195D581912BB1AE"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/CDe-npL3Kc6hxdlxyuihgKpv86A>
Subject: Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:19:13 -0000


On 01/06/2018 17:05, Rob Shakir wrote:
> The SPRING WG defines procedures that allow a node to steer a packet 
> through an
> SR Policy instantiated as an ordered list of instructions called 
> segments and
> without the need for per-path state information to be held at transit 
> nodes.

I am not sure where the line gets drawn with the per-path state 
statement. If I introduce a
binding-SID to allow the creation of a path, have I introduced per-path 
state or not? In practise
a management entity will choose between the infinity of possible 
binding-SIDs by considering
the need to create specific paths and I would imagine that many will be 
instantiated just-in-time.

I think that the key point is that the ingress creates the path by using 
SIDs to create
a concatenation of paths, policies and resources. However it could be 
argued that
as soon as we introduced Binding SIDs we introduced per-path state. I 
think we might
be best served by deleting the text I have highlighted.

- Stewart