Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Fri, 06 September 2019 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3441120124; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bd2glZ898-eu; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F2291200E9; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108159.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x86Fhvie026813; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:47:43 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=xitQpDywMm0BkO0hKPZxWO2MWSOqsrX4WuVyvhPSl54=; b=JQlqvQ1AAGCmq5oMpqUwG5H1WvSsLCzBBMkMwwZx5K6JItT08X9LzvXiwNdMBIhxABmC +gFmOZa2eLRWfceGSdxWoBFS/ocS3SgHLlotZT3KlViwLmail1onPHxFbKEUbXqM62og hjGOWpI7hw9iTEKcIQ+gqI0D3WnPx2pO9ejHQygNQ8qmMaGFzElry4rYba42NXL2mU92 G9ChJKqCh2CKkKlydCN3S5OqK5MNblX+kn/hRt6oKfcZwvquDj5a9wIj4DOEQOx/O4+1 SGvlDSBM+QnWuYbjBMZBD9MjQS9xxABDdZLUt+VX5SFu8lJ8PtJ6xv9S7imiOF9u3xvA Lw==
Received: from nam01-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01lp2058.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.58]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uumtkrr3q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Sep 2019 08:47:43 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OWKcprrmi/MKrxjSEpkDykGrBwTiboiVSWP7uEWs7s9vU+8QcY82ngg3U0ysyITF0ERlo4EwWfFRU4jnOHyVylFIHjEEGv2OMGCG7qztryDb9ZE2fcvw0uT8YuZL91rkfVyq6pGWTUoVXU9fuXQofLMIv41o1ZhD0C+l8F+5Zs8yQQmC0q4qKNZ0VyemCUWxP5q9fF0eh0c0rXpshFXNmAM/+wIjFOpWDVa3cw7ZrLo29Uur/SSrds/ZJ3RGVxl92lW+HOGYhIX/ka+gb0oEi38RWV5Jf7IdzESki3kNxGecek2F7kvjUbo/tzgkvQ/Hr3mBULyMYOxtQWsQYKpncw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xitQpDywMm0BkO0hKPZxWO2MWSOqsrX4WuVyvhPSl54=; b=ocpBMeg8G8XfAlMlIJISPejCjV1ieFLtn0aQKz1fHivw0Jxo5lfx3yFo6ySDXS+MGNLL/AJiEVL5m2d1Q61UvSxMQ5rlkLBcnHn0rDTeZc8mFa5+x+Ngst6BnoS/dZ4OOIe6XN64VowRl04ILco/vnRi1zmnDl8UMUgfBHmaQLB2SPEUEEUNxiZZ1q5EZlJb60TJxqSFInK175IbDlJQ9VIDFX1QnVcVRs8eg7BCU5a2qS+cOzsGDf+lHgW+/L7qDCtRXi+VFz9rcivdT64VNlnckXz/zcS5CIvCPzA/4/3mhkKg7nlSgF6joqgjaYuEKdWNz1uNaUmYOW/Sdgt4rQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
Received: from BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.177.185.144) by BYAPR05MB6021.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.178.53.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2263.10; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:46:54 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f4f2:f284:d49a:890a]) by BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f4f2:f284:d49a:890a%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2263.005; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:46:54 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>
CC: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function
Thread-Index: AQHVYaiGkQrPBxFhV02Y8RCTv8yVq6cZzxWAgANe64CAAAKegIAAVJCAgABDXXCAAItTgIAAet8A
Content-Class:
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:46:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR05MB5463E9041AB1A10A46E2A9FAAEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HK0PR03MB3970C6DCC635E7CD802D65FDFCBD0@HK0PR03MB3970.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB54636A2332FED916A26A6F14AEBD0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3e31873a-278a-2154-0e71-4d820bba323d@gont.com.ar> <4012D854-2F10-4476-951D-FFFE73C5083C@gmail.com> <cb2f56f8-acdc-d68d-0878-9609cb3d7b1b@gont.com.ar> <28214_1567694772_5D711FB4_28214_238_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48BFA9F3@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <b83a7060-0517-c6ad-f6b0-bc9e61e4667f@si6networks.com> <A6FA74AC-F349-4F01-A86A-949870134779@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB546363BF8D7D1EC848EB3103AEBA0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CA+b+ERmdCB9RVstq2sUnkYLM29ayE6jZuWARQv7HRbsMW_Tu-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmdCB9RVstq2sUnkYLM29ayE6jZuWARQv7HRbsMW_Tu-w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Owner=rbonica@juniper.net; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2019-09-06T15:46:52.9272469Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Application=Microsoft Azure Information Protection; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=1dd0ca2d-d85f-4715-974e-ffbac8f40057; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.2.0.14
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: efa5b729-c64b-4948-1472-08d732e17144
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4618075)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB6021;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB6021:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB602195BA171F7114F86922D2AEBA0@BYAPR05MB6021.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790;
x-forefront-prvs: 0152EBA40F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(366004)(189003)(199004)(2906002)(5660300002)(790700001)(3846002)(6116002)(86362001)(446003)(11346002)(486006)(476003)(99286004)(71190400001)(71200400001)(102836004)(54906003)(26005)(186003)(4326008)(6506007)(7696005)(76176011)(53546011)(498600001)(256004)(14444005)(81166006)(76116006)(561944003)(33656002)(7736002)(74316002)(14454004)(8936002)(54896002)(6306002)(55016002)(1411001)(6246003)(25786009)(8676002)(81156014)(9686003)(53936002)(6916009)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(66066001)(52536014)(229853002)(6436002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB6021; H:BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hsmgovr19milC1xg3lofRFdXI6Q5lP9hCj9lLsagDxMpCiQsw4jeFuyld0nBQRoSf/Xw1QwkY7UmvUf16hdIM05J2jq5u3yNzaFig4UK46Hic+lnu/Ag7/uq/b2FFiYB9MX8As56l0iFUTiRUORh3RuTgWRGojpXxMVFPXPFxIaVZAXwh/K3HQlyOwjzQqdBHG3OINFXknKI+0Ms+Af4mpKNTfwUhg/oQS7jpLZRdOajB6DPo6bKp9ZAGouYJ2kEdPKRU2PzzaaJnLFMBLSY4MMDsnGGUtk+wyLJVhagDdmVu2Mv5mrp8ssGBtC7YLwYKbfPgn//suiwdnPXYd7rIH1xtXOcYE+nqnNG7Sqb/jHpkbmTPoxv5ubZaxSo+dK8gBYRYlYi+bzgYQCYjO5fVjy024fHcJRguG86KKdbazc=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR05MB5463E9041AB1A10A46E2A9FAAEBA0BYAPR05MB5463namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: efa5b729-c64b-4948-1472-08d732e17144
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Sep 2019 15:46:54.4052 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: RLAxaH4mSR2kJ85FSjb6CBqNgQKe4LMVv900IVuLt5sVZkFW4uDQwatF/YiKzqNfNaOAb/eYjE7oSmkY+sgUPQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB6021
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-06_06:2019-09-04,2019-09-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1909060166
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/C0Lvo86U_Vg5PSOmAUDfmyWwxZQ>
Subject: Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 15:47:54 -0000

Robert,

Your comment about killing innovation in the IETF strikes me as being odd. I never recommended shutting down SRv6 work. In fact, I support it.

It is you who are asking to shut down SRv6+ work.

So, who is looking to kill innovation in the IETF?

                                                     Ron


From: Robert Raszuk <rraszuk@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 4:18 AM
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes@cisco.com>om>; Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>om>; spring@ietf.org; 6man@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function

Ron,

> They remind us that draft-ietf-spring-network-programming are far from maturity.

To me it actually highlights something quite contrary. It is that some folks are pretty far from appreciating or even grasping the value of the proposal.

In your other note you have extensively elaborated well on how to effectively kill innovation in IETF. If we would be following your advice there would be almost non documents which build on former work and update former work.

But most importantly documenting something does not force anyone to actually use it if they choose so. This entire smoke about header insertion from what I have been told has some technical concerns about real source awareness about say MTU issues. Well for one if I am doing insertion in my network I better make sure I do not drop the packet based on the MTU. It is so basic ... of course I must clean up when I fwd the packet to other domain but this is basic network hygiene.

In the same time folks are happy to encap + add EHs, DOs etc ... on the grounds that src of the encap will be in the packet. Is this sufficient .. even if ICMP is sent to such src (domian ingress) I bet such domain ingress will not notify the original packet src anyway. And with encap the packet gets much bigger anyway.

But I was not part of v6 creators and I think I will keep it that way based on that little thread we had here :)

Best,
R.



Juniper Business Use Only