IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Tue, 18 March 2014 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADB71A0308 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lnKRj19hPZ7 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7EE1A0303 for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BCE02506; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:43:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:43:06 +0000
Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:43:07 +0000
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.115]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:43:03 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
Thread-Index: AQHPQfLVpfOf864ZGkG19DcXg93pK5rmAffQ
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:43:03 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08262891@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <CF4791F4.50809%aretana@cisco.com> <1a1b7ca9665a44cfb26a78b800ad6a55@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <1a1b7ca9665a44cfb26a78b800ad6a55@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.134]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE08262891NKGEML512MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/IB3VkcghLhQ6GcVxltQw6bcXLIY
Cc: "draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org" <draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:43:28 -0000

Support.

Xiaohu


From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 5:10 PM
To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

Hi!

This message officially starts the call for adoption for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement.

Please indicate your position about adopting this use cases draft by end-of-day on March 27, 2014.

Some additional background:  We had issued a call for adoption for draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02 back in November.  From both the discussion at the meeting in Vancouver and on the list, there was consensus to adopt.  The authors published draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00 as a revision to the original draft without the solution being present in the use case description.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00>

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email