IETF Logo Mail Archive

[spring] 答复: WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Wed, 19 March 2014 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C51A04BC for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.203
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FnnGnyMegp2 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C17D1A04E9 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BCF03734; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 01:28:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 01:28:45 +0000
Received: from NKGEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.41) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 01:28:56 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.85]) by nkgeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:28:50 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
Thread-Index: AQHPPwCOU6uTwqSmp0CegKCp7RwRAJrmZ2SAgAE/jWA=
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 01:28:49 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8450A1DA@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CF4791F4.50809%aretana@cisco.com> <CAB75xn63QOQ7V30kX7gr4s+gMa2OUc9JrXBibfoDZfsjsrXMQQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn63QOQ7V30kX7gr4s+gMa2OUc9JrXBibfoDZfsjsrXMQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.115]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA8450A1DAnkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/J2ahCAG_kan2r3EW5q2NrWMWjYQ
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org" <draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] 答复: WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 01:29:17 -0000

Support.
-Qin
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com<mailto:aretana@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi!

This message officially starts the call for adoption for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement.

Please indicate your position about adopting this use cases draft by end-of-day on March 27, 2014.

Some additional background:  We had issued a call for adoption for draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02 back in November.  From both the discussion at the meeting in Vancouver and on the list, there was consensus to adopt.  The authors published draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00 as a revision to the original draft without the solution being present in the use case description.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00>

Thanks!

Alvaro.

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email