Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net> Wed, 19 March 2014 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384A51A0343 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j2MOR4in2X7d for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C671A0341 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (pool-72-73-23-184.clppva.fios.verizon.net [72.73.23.184]) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2J2a7fQ008307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 22:36:08 -0400
References: <CF4791F4.50809%aretana@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CF4791F4.50809%aretana@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-4E63DA01-9E0C-4878-9966-F04DEF779F22"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <ABEE37C5-1F0D-4DBD-8B40-B62EE58398D9@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D167)
From: Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 22:36:05 -0400
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.7 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 22:36:08 -0400 (EDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/o0uqhgYWC-sVNnJai_XdICZLkJM
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org" <draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 02:36:22 -0000

Support

-Jon

> On Mar 13, 2014, at 5:09 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> This message officially starts the call for adoption for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement.
> 
> Please indicate your position about adopting this use cases draft by end-of-day on March 27, 2014.
> 
> Some additional background:  We had issued a call for adoption for draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02 back in November.  From both the discussion at the meeting in Vancouver and on the list, there was consensus to adopt.  The authors published draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00 as a revision to the original draft without the solution being present in the use case description.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro.
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring