IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Fri, 14 March 2014 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81B91A0099 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bUVkLDp1cE47 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187271A00A5 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BCB27844; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:02:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:01:13 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.38) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:02:05 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.94]) by SZXEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:58:41 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
Thread-Index: AQHPPwCOU6uTwqSmp0CegKCp7RwRAJrgOFSg
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:58:40 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE25D98BA9D@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CF4791F4.50809%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF4791F4.50809%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.72]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE25D98BA9DSZXEMA510MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/xqPSgG-gGGeDxcseEv3rENzM_BI
Cc: "draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org" <draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:02:16 -0000

Yes/support.

Best regards,
Mach

From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:10 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

Hi!

This message officially starts the call for adoption for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement.

Please indicate your position about adopting this use cases draft by end-of-day on March 27, 2014.

Some additional background:  We had issued a call for adoption for draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02 back in November.  From both the discussion at the meeting in Vancouver and on the list, there was consensus to adopt.  The authors published draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00 as a revision to the original draft without the solution being present in the use case description.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00>

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email