Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT. Tue, 27 April 2021 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDBA3A1271; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w0vajOqVVJks; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31E93A1272; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 43BB0A108F056C9FDC3B; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:11:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with SMTP id 13R3BE27053451; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:11:14 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
Received: from mapi (mgapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid81; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:11:14 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:11:14 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa608780d287e874fa
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: 13R3BE27053451
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:11:29 -0000

Hi Loa,

thank you for your kind offer. Would posting the draft by Wednesday, before the meeting on Thursday be acceptable?


Greg Mirsky

Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division


Original Mail

Sender: LoaAndersson
To: Greg Mirsky;MPLS Working Group;mpls;spring;;pwe3;;
CC:;Stewart Bryant;Italo Busi;Adrian Farrel;
Date: 2021/04/26 01:25
Subject: Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.


Do you plan to post this - if you do so timely I'm prepared to give you 
30 min for a walk through at the DT meeting on Tuesday.


On 20/04/2021 21:42, Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Dear All,
> Stewart, Adrian, Italo, Huub, and I had discussed the question of 
> multiple GALs in an MPLS label stack after the IETF-110. The question is 
> directly related to the mechanism proposed in 
> draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification 
> <>. 
> I've put together a short draft (attached). It appears, that this issue 
> may fit in the scope of the work of the MPLS Open DT. Appreciate 
> your thoughts on whether it can be discussed at one of the Open DT 
> meetings. Also, welcome your comments, suggestion on the attached draft.
> Regards,
> Greg (on behalf of the group)


Loa Andersson                        email:
Senior MPLS Expert                
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

spring mailing list