Re: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

[梁艳荣 <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,

 I agree with the modification of V-15.  And it's recommended to expedite the completion of the last call process for this standard.
 Since there is already a related 6man SRH compression draft(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr/>), facing the same issue, it would be best if it could solve the upper layer checksum problem together.
 
Thanks,
Yanrong

Original

> 发件人: Alvaro Retana<[e-mail]>
> 时间: 2024/04/03(星期三)01:41
> 收件人: SPRING WG List<[e-mail]>;
> 抄送人: spring-chairs<[e-mail]>;
> 主题: Re: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
[Moving this message up on everyone’s mailbox.]

Dear WG:

We have received no replies to this request.  If no changes are needed to §6.5 then that is ok, but if you have a different opinion please speak up.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On March 28, 2024 at 8:04:30 AM, Alvaro Retana ([e-mail]) wrote:
> 
> 
> Section 6.5 of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression describes the behavior when an originating node inside an SRv6 domain creates a packet with a C-SID as the final destination. This description differs from the text in Section 8.1 of RFC8200.  
> 
> 
> We plan to send the draft to the 6man WG for review and explicitly highlight this difference. 
> 
> 
> Please comment on the text in Section 6.5. Does anything need to be added, deleted, changed, or clarified? 
> 
> 
> We want to ask for feedback soon; please send comments on this topic by April 5th.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Alvaro.
> -- for spring-chairs