IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Status] SPRING Charter

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 16 October 2013 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B0921F9E46; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bzG5-TQQDzpK; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB0E21F9D2B; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=747; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1381947962; x=1383157562; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=VpEaS8oUez2Wr/GrE/lsf4ytwLZ7ZyTo67gs77Zio7o=; b=KZlbOwHvVHNlDtmn3nwdRZqeZBOW/wUabWgdpD8LDRrSQw9MWxOc4MSJ vWDdm58CpEyjelv/II9eaTf34Y0yHEA6jJQZUupzREUMv2j9cjAIp+/tc XMbwEZSDCb5X+J7K1FnX01J+SliFITY5wU2S9tHm7tWMJNak13yc6GcuP o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFAAnZXlKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABagweBCr1xgR4WdIInAQQ6LRISAQgSEBRCFw4CBAENBQiHfr9KjyAxB4MfgQYDqgaDJIIp
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,508,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="273006530"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2013 18:26:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9GIQ1Vh004401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:26:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.40]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:26:01 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Thread-Topic: [Status] SPRING Charter
Thread-Index: AQHOxrVkUYi6pW/k1kW1dQ64aj+T65n2IEsAgAGjcwCAACp7AIAANAYA
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:26:01 +0000
Message-ID: <BBD66FD99311804F80324E8139B3C94E39644830@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <525ECAB2.6030302@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.251.221]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9DE75D4630BEB74B83BAC5778CC16766@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Status] SPRING Charter
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:26:20 -0000

On 10/16/13 7:19 PM, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
wrote:

>>
>>"Any modification of or extension to existing architectures,
>>data planes, or control or management plane protocols
>>must be carried out in the working groups responsible
>>for the architecture, data plane, or control or
>>management plane protocol being modified and in
>>co-ordination with this working group, but may be
>>done in this working group after agreement with
>>all the relevant WG chairs and responsible Area Directors."
>>
>>So I think we're in agreement.
>>
>Yes, but it looks like the deliverables text is slight out of
>alignment - hence my proposed slight tweek
>
>s/and\/or/for/

That works for me.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email