IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Status] SPRING Charter

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 16 October 2013 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: status@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B1811E8145; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ehmwvs9-JDFL; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE04211E8144; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7192CC6C; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:11:13 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tb1VLP_1fTQP; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:11:12 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2D2CC48; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:11:12 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=P_aBwJMOgbLHgMHceBU=QbMQT=d_A6DRfDroHMR-F-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:11:12 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A710072-199D-456D-9DB3-C7DBAC0AA0A2@piuha.net>
References: <52584CCA.8000902@cisco.com> <201310151346.r9FDkSIl023262@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <525ECA07.2070207@cisco.com> <9C5D9C4D-F90E-48B3-A005-3DAC1EEC378F@juniper.net> <AA242DD4-AEE1-465B-8A3C-8887FA1542BB@piuha.net> <CA+b+ER=P_aBwJMOgbLHgMHceBU=QbMQT=d_A6DRfDroHMR-F-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "status@ietf.org" <status@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Status] SPRING Charter
X-BeenThere: status@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <status.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/status>
List-Post: <mailto:status@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/status>, <mailto:status-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:11:21 -0000

Robert - I think we discussed this previously. One of my issues was that it is not just your well-protected network that is in danger. It is also my network with thousand machines, with one accidentally turned on to accept the new headers. The current text in the charter resolves that concern, and I'm not sure I want to have headers that wouldn't be able to do protect against this… particularly when the cost is minimal.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email