Re: [stir] Review of: draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-10

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 8/9/2016 3:01 PM, Peterson, Jon wrote:
>> The idea that authors would seek working group consensus about whether
>> to respond in detail to a detailed review is outside of my IETF
>> experience.  I'm astonished at the very idea of it.
>
> It is not at all outside of my experience to ask a working group if it
> thinks that a set of objections (cast as questions or no) merit further
> consideration.

That's not quite what you are doing, Jon.  You are, instead, asking 
whether they are worth /any/ explicit, public consideration.  Really, 
that's a process point of an entirely different color.


> I will stress again that, from my initial response to your stir-passport
> review, I immediately agreed that you had made some helpful comments in

Yes you did.  So it's unfortunate that that fact is entirely irrelevant 
to the current discussion, since it has nothing to do with the question 
of have /any/ detailed public response to details of a review.


d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net