IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Review of: draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-10

Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Tue, 09 August 2016 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AFE12D8D7 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=shockey.us
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yYSkNJ31kXk6 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.21.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 85FAD12D8D4 for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7029 invoked by uid 0); 9 Aug 2016 22:51:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by qproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 9 Aug 2016 22:51:49 -0000
Received: from box462.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.62]) by CMOut01 with id VAmk1t00E1MNPNq01AmnM2; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:46:48 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AL9Ak13q c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:117 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=ZZnuYtJkoWoA:10 a=8WrITzYgnNwA:10 a=etTHQkYnwnYA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=b8OvNEjoAAAA:8 a=k7Ga1wGzAAAA:8 a=m7mwjqgD-lhMxblObj0A:9 a=SzhSZKVG_vx5BCgI:21 a=hAR29G8oaJPlhQNS:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=xfJ8-ueq0pyqlCF7aVox:22 a=ijMaxGghyylP-n2pFjDB:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:In-Reply-To :References:Message-ID:To:From:Subject:Date; bh=kXanyvUddvfqkXBdc2rI0NKBfHBxOCBCKx/3V9TDE64=; b=DlGgB8japZ8plv1CdsrVPTvoQf rJLrMaQ5Eu3jA9mD6irQbuQiO27QfuotVJrua9Ybamlxub1fy3ZFmcXCE/iv7J88lIsv1UZcthUTP 3PjjYmKsIEhbtE8af6ac3BDx5;
Received: from pool-100-36-40-228.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.36.40.228]:53991 helo=[192.168.1.152]) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1bXFnJ-0006kd-7E; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 16:46:45 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.18.0.160709
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 18:46:43 -0400
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <69C5763D-5F8B-4150-840A-03775B140A2D@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [stir] Review of: draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-10
References: <c3a85ffc-8340-ac54-4d8e-21a16fefd032@dcrocker.net> <4B1956260CD29F4A9622F00322FE053101285D016E32@BOBO1A.bobotek.net> <D3CF2934.1A6EE6%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <1dbc154e-1ffc-689a-6f4f-45321e1149f6@dcrocker.net> <CE4A6DFE-54A3-482C-A4D9-8CBDD6BC6E25@shockey.us> <eec5d03e-a631-7a63-a5be-f416db013e65@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <eec5d03e-a631-7a63-a5be-f416db013e65@dcrocker.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 100.36.40.228 authed with richard+shockey.us}
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box462.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - shockey.us
X-Source-IP: 100.36.40.228
X-Exim-ID: 1bXFnJ-0006kd-7E
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-36-40-228.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([192.168.1.152]) [100.36.40.228]:53991
X-Source-Auth: richard+shockey.us
X-Email-Count: 0
X-Source-Cap: c2hvY2tleXU7c2hvY2tleXU7Ym94NDYyLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/iUeccXz0HY1UBRMci5m4hvG47wU>
Subject: Re: [stir] Review of: draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis-10
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:51:53 -0000

Do you or do you not want a full stop?   Are you willing to go to the IESG and say these documents have not received full WG review? 

Put up or …



On 8/9/16, 4:16 PM, "stir on behalf of Dave Crocker" <stir-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

    On 8/9/2016 1:02 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:
    > Well let me take this opportunity to totally reject Dave’s comments and the implication that we have not followed proper IETF process and procedures.
    
    Forgive me, but I did not intend -- and believe I did not assert -- any 
    such implication of prior process problems.  To the extent that any such 
    implications seemed apparent, I apologize for the confusion.
    
    My concern was/is about the way my comments would be handled, wanting to 
    make sure that what should be discussed openly would be.
    
    d/
    
    -- 
    
       Dave Crocker
       Brandenburg InternetWorking
       bbiw.net
    
    _______________________________________________
    stir mailing list
    stir@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email