IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Fri, 29 September 2017 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33FC133055; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B1QNo3xbV_q8; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE7C6132396; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id t69so157911wmt.2; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=wjt6TsIHDiL9M52l+e+kh7AJy4s+6OAms62WNnTm6j4=; b=a/Dnh35wRrFmnO2uwhFkfphcFWr/oKj8q4X60SA44WpV4GccxJ0QVj4cZ+xFKmIwcB fJ1reRkMXfUX0F6673ozLM+IBp4QRA8n9lPcogjWiuFkBq2UKoXtsbWLEVMHlRFbKtB8 RP25+FtF1sSwp3Tv80rMgQJoXBZBVHgqeOX3ZGypQsbzHXQba4wJqk7gc+iwStYb7E9g 9DIrrZF8//3qcexSo/EpeVTDwQXpMAZAIkRtkSsFKyIKxR8H2gFefpFy3A8XIgE2dfJ4 99EfLmjuneysCJ4TR8XGdTMf12dOLEAuqpuZ2IH1SDaAfnSSX0v4BmlQ3D8J60g4NWi/ Xf2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=wjt6TsIHDiL9M52l+e+kh7AJy4s+6OAms62WNnTm6j4=; b=dUvERgk5jr2ZPOt/Q7bK9bpC/0YD3TuVhRT9UxLJp8BeEC0WFvhw6gqsnl3mQreq5M hxwJRom8/AL76liypDI5eLtmHAZ3hH5Sz78MPuOOUuv8F0fsWyR0JgW7pKk6FA+AFddY RiLJiwzlq8XS6o/JPmX7oKL9VgBtvb2AVX1FptJqlMsav6sebKTOtJKaBSC6va/Xw2BA HotS5GV+PmNW1ZwDX/+flOrW0TRE8TARNXrcr9U/HwgQGZksy0HJPhUtuRm23dTnmQWD J+vqbzwoFO6KmUFeaqIFMnXGRfJbUX3YX8TuUmeQZzPlNo6CDxbIx+tIkyn3zhOi1hJG KxuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgz9O1ONEdr5wD8l+dq8o76f3hJUq1UmN+TF+dE2K/iXI0Cy94P QIhKHEyV1mPtQDVzSFL8QTWC+EPy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAOi4o4eJxyVjXP6beXk9Qv7e1HKBRZ2VAvpf88f+ujLaf4/tzWhdiI9CSB2RmGPLX7tEzvUg==
X-Received: by 10.80.221.11 with SMTP id t11mr10196230edk.84.1506698050206; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a99sm4044522edf.54.2017.09.29.08.14.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 08:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, sunset4-chairs@ietf.org, sunset4@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf@ietf.org, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
References: <150660518277.13796.5801483741214576151.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMm+LwicKPpZ8+0AbrDx5+twqHWH=rTXTbrVQhPS=7VA-0a=qg@mail.gmail.com> <D5F29735.87F38%lee@asgard.org> <CAMm+Lwh97O_XL_u3j_SQK8c7yWURzLLqdBAhzTuUA+deYq0YSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0b0b3277-e8b6-697d-f886-d332ca68185d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:14:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwh97O_XL_u3j_SQK8c7yWURzLLqdBAhzTuUA+deYq0YSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6F490A024B52116D29AB3088"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/KKrWyBvSUE8fR10zbN1xDTE4ni0>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:14:14 -0000


On 29/09/2017 15:59, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org 
> <mailto:lee@asgard.org>> wrote:
>
>     Then change the name to NPv4?
>
>     Do we care what people do on their private networks? Is it any of
>     our business?
>
>     Lee
>
>
> ​Since network use of IETF protocols is at least as important as 
> Internet, yes it is very much IETF business if it wants to remain 
> relevant.
>
> As for what the IPv4 consortium would do, I wrote out a draft list:
>
> * Determine IPR policy.
> * Chose venues for upcoming meetings.​
> * Form advisory committees.
> * Hold elections to advisory committees.
> * Set a schedule of membership fees.
>
> And that is just for starters.

... and they might perhaps figure out some technology wheeze that we did 
not notice, or which was less pure than we would accept, but none the 
less acceptable to most users, and thereby find a way to extend the 
service life of IPv4.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email