IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 29 September 2017 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EB4132EA7; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6vLWlRiD-cfH; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803AA132396; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id j126so2413461oia.10; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ie/QMx9q7RTTFkBJur5HHA4pLr/5eXxSLNvQILF1Dio=; b=bXk1yNwAUpZnoyBf1+Zkfmq27KoRfxg5R/onaZccKD6uRoQOMQ1G7rB4doEbFb5Rcj jioK+8W7n5mfmwYr8reBWGJbW3zYkO3NtvqnmVe4YtpQYTtn71IJkufZmYqTWgHGiPRq pRSWKqiK3pdrDV1jZKamdxymLXxpgGwOMAi46+P+Trxo6rPvzSsQBTBvuKcZAQY3Gtu2 0WqGKiuViz4c3ZnxrdnH/NdG1B/1YAn2nWOobXyEy3N8SpRzU/0WSWbv5YsRAF9dC2fP fNk6uZlvZKbB/sha7Qgq2msq0iy5CqBVQTsvjON+qSdQBEovmdJpGM4Wm6cenf0iO/ML 5hlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ie/QMx9q7RTTFkBJur5HHA4pLr/5eXxSLNvQILF1Dio=; b=sWPBQcniBF2t9Ty6h3FAF3Afdzhzwc/OWjaRlKDg1hTsKav5E/nTsGaZADTVW3aHrU 8XZQZ3hUxW6ZyVEonkK+grKbSKne+cj0YsIBtBpztbhlE4Vg9mjb39NxGhNIm+kypdya p63NuWfPwxe7LzP690AlrWB1SrXf8DuDcllxjnld0yLE+hQ3zzmDSBTXB/1h0xK23uMs xU8xjtTibx8YVdqLUlyBuI+jUhK8m0vJAixKtUrzVQkMlIHbwnE1QSrhpfG4PZQOmE4u /6S6tWVCsbI6xt67M5Y0+ja4jXSy6a7FNi2YnQ/zeojETnJZS79epycc9Eqn8Y+eU4x2 zy7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXZO6vKeRfcP5hX2wmoqcGCXve6r7Ffq8y9jZxqLpq9zmTF/TUV dzkFIxW17Vq8DsKoLmhgv0oJnHlcBCmgbhGOdvhv1A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDaoqjJK7GxCv4sk6//Gu1bsIdWRvEsi/2svJmr1OvNTjYLdRCmhdTMBf+LfgcuigKLMe5noLbZMzRGw2q3B4o=
X-Received: by 10.202.197.130 with SMTP id v124mr2314745oif.265.1506697172885; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.157.95.12 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D5F29735.87F38%lee@asgard.org>
References: <150660518277.13796.5801483741214576151.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMm+LwicKPpZ8+0AbrDx5+twqHWH=rTXTbrVQhPS=7VA-0a=qg@mail.gmail.com> <D5F29735.87F38%lee@asgard.org>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:59:32 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hLdsDlyzqoNoCzQavU6jZyoXufY
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwh97O_XL_u3j_SQK8c7yWURzLLqdBAhzTuUA+deYq0YSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, sunset4@ietf.org, sunset4-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf@ietf.org, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, terry.manderson@icann.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134fac0c6328a055a5545c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/gjp3el4LbHPIUm7kt5hFA_Liat8>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01.txt> (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:59:35 -0000

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> wrote:
>
> Then change the name to NPv4?
>
> Do we care what people do on their private networks? Is it any of our
> business?
>
> Lee
>
>
​Since network use of IETF protocols is at least as important as Internet,
yes it is very much IETF business if it wants to remain relevant.

As for what the IPv4 consortium would do, I wrote out a draft list:

* Determine IPR policy.
* Chose venues for upcoming meetings.​
* Form advisory committees.
* Hold elections to advisory committees.
* Set a schedule of membership fees.

And that is just for starters.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email