IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [T2TRG] [Ace] Proposed document: draft-amsuess-t2trg-raytime-01

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 20 July 2023 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD248C15109E for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 11:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TcQ4QUFNcpZ8 for <t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 11:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF220C15109D for <t2trg@irtf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 11:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB86F3898F; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:13:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Q4Lb1MB92XAb; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:40a:34ff:fe10:f571]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9428C3898D; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1689876784; bh=AdOlIPMwIx8Rqt0IewJq6I4nCYoiqevkBZ2on928AoI=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=wKkQciwOJYI3F3E8BxmkxEDym20lId4vdLLhjlpErwb7ehCnXKrIGxpplrvFSwWfJ QVqLoZNfp2F+RWZfftGz1C+WCZ612ffKKgWTQJhsbeJhXBCZMFnWVmxzsDaCBm5dzL L8omJnlFxbR2ZQwPs9e3X67abuQn6f4Jb0gmAFOw3J+GeFiBIw73n3tn+82EikfzII ycoOG+mnxbrVHCbtYd1U1I5OZRYxngDEiQ2+1YsJWyStUiGVyZnd0r75F4YBlUcjaA 55WihXnpJ7p/ThsJAFJfLXMHf4C2j1QEtf8oERhci4MLoZg4dul48spSIP5Me5w3gV GY3m4qReMybAg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732396B; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>
cc: t2trg@irtf.org, ace@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <ZLkuJRLvzKHHdkOs@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <168883322499.53446.17396889799798496302@ietfa.amsl.com> <ZK8ZAhrecN1D+1y3@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <16086.1689202658@localhost> <ZLkuJRLvzKHHdkOs@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:13:04 -0400
Message-ID: <16333.1689876784@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/t2trg/S9mNmeqzuYcN8ptNGI_ucEXEMNs>
Subject: Re: [T2TRG] [Ace] Proposed document: draft-amsuess-t2trg-raytime-01
X-BeenThere: t2trg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Thing-to-Thing Research Group <t2trg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/t2trg/>
List-Post: <mailto:t2trg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 18:13:12 -0000

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote:
    >> We wrote something similiar for RFC8366 or 8995, but I think we ripped
    >> most of it out.  For instance, if a device had a valid IDevID with a
    >> notBefore of 2021-02-01, and the RTC said 1980-01-01 [good old DOS
    >> epoch], then one could be sure it was at least 2021-02-01!

    > Does either of those have a versioned history? Without a change log in
    > them, and no mention of the example DOS epoch discoverable in either, I
    > couldn't find what was there.

Yes, DT and github.com/anima-wg/bootstrap.
I looked back a bunch coming up with:
https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/blob/5f2527381c291af12f4f9df3c26feb1d079bda20/dtbootstrap-anima-keyinfra.txt
section 2.6.1... but thtat's really the same text as in the RFC.
Let' try git blame...

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-18#section-2.6.1

This might not be the last version that had this more complex text.
It seemed like it was riff for distracting review comments, and didn't really
help our primary focus, so it go removed sometime later.
Unfortunate that the version buttons on the right don't retain the section number.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email