IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] TCP components

Mohamed Oulmahdi <m.oulmahdi@gmail.com> Fri, 19 June 2015 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <m.oulmahdi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE401A6F1E for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kytmalkwDzrh for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AE7D1A1B2D for <taps@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgi11 with SMTP id gi11so30296818wic.0 for <taps@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5PO8rwyLBEez2Kbn06nSCxD756f0UceOhhaqH908FSo=; b=B37TLF6BU8yFN/VDpdl9xFmvo/vlKynI+fewxPax1NxSkrU7Lsmh+CPPvyiWw8IEnB E/wMtJeoyIO7YMKqjjEQRhoh05F+zWVfjaXeyAGHpCSjOxcK05UV51JXUbXMv6jbJ0ms cifM8shIuvQ2Hi5ELLPGiFVPv53PMmqRzVm0KjPoih1zHNNQdNtokfyeBqXYTdM7ZcGj lSTceDKUU+O75G5ibFfsi8cmhskqxm3XGOfsm3T+FPVyUPsU5sFXukUFWhZHFSdO8EM+ Gw65xeWjVHNUUL/s40iU7vgFBQI/vmf67QwRgrXLqitGLY5ncPTe+LghiAT3VE83bJgG Tasg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.19.100 with SMTP id d4mr10636695wie.29.1434753773048; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.145.7 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5584937F.2030408@isi.edu>
References: <5579768E.5060402@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <A3EF3A19-0E37-42E6-8D17-94164EBA7FDD@ifi.uio.no> <154FD7B7-9A01-43EC-927D-B9D71F1BC38D@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <57DC7DAB-7054-41BE-8515-626353782BBC@ifi.uio.no> <5581B81B.4090500@isi.edu> <725D4141-40AB-4E30-9409-96813C80905B@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <33CA72C2-D0EC-43A1-B766-D34F3636961B@ifi.uio.no> <23AACB56-2044-4E89-930B-C7D501AD7184@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <E788A309-869F-49E0-832D-429E0DA0E2F9@ifi.uio.no> <DA987915-C664-40D9-B527-9A686BA01013@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <C2962821-4DF2-44CD-BBEF-49520B5BA4D3@ifi.uio.no> <5584400C.5080406@isi.edu> <CAJ+dxNCN3Pj4x707hr50V-GZHJvQM_S8cx1g3NTZne086T3sOQ@mail.gmail.com> <5584937F.2030408@isi.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 00:42:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ+dxND-KRA_=cfe6iPG6oWD+M_YegY7MBUqnSutEKdXrjpoag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mohamed Oulmahdi <m.oulmahdi@gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec53d5c63fb96e80518e6a4dc"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/15GiumNV-tM94uLNS7H4WA6bmfo>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Taps] TCP components
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 22:42:56 -0000

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:

>
> You're getting far ahead of the conversation, IMO. This document needs to
> start by explaining the services we already have before jumping into a
> "service of services" model.
>
> I don't disagree with the goal, but it's impractical to develop a
> meta-interface when the base interface has not been described.


It is just to say that TCP already defines its services, and the goal is
not to give another definition of these services, but only to change the
way they are exposed to applications. So the services definition already
exists, but implicitly.

>
>
> Joe
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email