IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] TCP components

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Fri, 19 June 2015 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9051A037E for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0eLNTBkVlCpC for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420941A036A for <taps@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C5FD930D; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:15:52 +0200 (MEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id V2eHkY66yT2E; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:15:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [192.168.178.33] (x4d02dd5d.dyn.telefonica.de [77.2.221.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mirjak) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53CB1D930C; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:15:52 +0200 (MEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <C2962821-4DF2-44CD-BBEF-49520B5BA4D3@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:15:51 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BB6B55E3-2FAF-4381-955B-0C5D505A13C6@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <5579768E.5060402@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <A3EF3A19-0E37-42E6-8D17-94164EBA7FDD@ifi.uio.no> <154FD7B7-9A01-43EC-927D-B9D71F1BC38D@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <57DC7DAB-7054-41BE-8515-626353782BBC@ifi.uio.no> <5581B81B.4090500@isi.edu> <725D4141-40AB-4E30-9409-96813C80905B@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <33CA72C2-D0EC-43A1-B766-D34F3636961B@ifi.uio.no> <23AACB56-2044-4E89-930B-C7D501AD7184@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <E788A309-869F-49E0-832D-429E0DA0E2F9@ifi.uio.no> <DA987915-C664-40D9-B527-9A686BA01013@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <C2962821-4DF2-44CD-BBEF-49520B5BA4D3@ifi.uio.no>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/reeEzGmLHi92D0MkYPX_8bHV0tc>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: [Taps] TCP components
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:15:56 -0000

Hi Michael,

> 
>> Again, if you have time to work on an alternative approach, please go ahead and provide input or even submit an own draft and I’m/we’re really open to discuss this and see what makes more sense. 
> 
> Ok....  well, I agree that what I request is easier said than done  :-(     myself, I've been working on a first version of document #2 as I think this would help us understand if the set of "services" or whatever we call them in document #1 is useful for the group's purpose.

Cool! I think that the alternative approach Brian just proposed: Start with the feature we think/know we want to have and the compare them with what we have in the first document.

Mirja

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email