Re: [Taps] TCP components

Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Wed, 17 June 2015 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A871A0469 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nrrKOdG-tgU for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99D61A00B1 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so43476734igb.0 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rzIncgH1ESRsHm+CYR1/2SIv/RK7tI8w9kfr/FGhs+s=; b=kGhbyt7G+xVC3SKhyRdVQpsvlaYMC2X4x1tC0x/FXkx+ygCLOu8K+uAxMUL1jBJq6J aru+xeskBrWXdSTZPyur64zcwwve1snjbpSAwbUeBGveydjza2YKRC6UmWXffcshTSEl 210QOzKfmdm5Mi2xF+G6IyBTsisP/zJJMcTQ2t4jXRV0FOP0xCaT69MDReXq6UnaQ58r tE+KfXWPJnJoUzY+zDqDqMSF/wMr4Y/wQTBEERWE1r4XKJ16aowiSN14wT1FylZ10kFi jY2BACI3gXspvS15HxGCPGfqpnlFuFuhJomssNW5wvBSpzufL9yK3nUcjGk9KOBbVq+z qUHw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.7.66 with SMTP id 63mr10001820ioh.28.1434565991182; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.59.225 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5581B81B.4090500@isi.edu>
References: <5579768E.5060402@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <A3EF3A19-0E37-42E6-8D17-94164EBA7FDD@ifi.uio.no> <154FD7B7-9A01-43EC-927D-B9D71F1BC38D@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <57DC7DAB-7054-41BE-8515-626353782BBC@ifi.uio.no> <5581B81B.4090500@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:33:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD62q9Ua0AhSXvYFFYq+sgDsAeRR+9EA4xPYX75KpdE+VvjwRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f8f2a4fb7ed0518baecfb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/iZU1uXnL5X2NhrwOBFaKBQPlfNI>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Taps] TCP components
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:33:13 -0000

Some suggested homework for the group: if you haven't done so recently,
read section 3.8 of RFC793.  (It's only 8 pages.)

--aaron


On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:

>
> IMO, if we don't understand the difference between the API in RFC793 vs.
> that in RFC4960 (and why 793 is a better example), then this is going to
> be a very bumpy road.
>