Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

Cool.  Are you proposing this as a wg item?

--aaron

On 27 Jun 2017, at 16:22, Tommy Pauly wrote:

> Hi Aaron,
>
> We have a draft we’ll be publishing in the next week that does a 
> survey of Transport Security protocols, and the interfaces they expose 
> to the transport layer as well as applications. We’d like to have a 
> slot to discuss this topic with the WG.
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
>> On Jun 27, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Here the short list of topics recently raised for our next meeting 
>> and some questions/comments. Please respond and suggest any other 
>> topics.
>>
>> draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt
>>
>> There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are there 
>> any specific topics we should set aside time to discuss?
>> Socket Intents
>>
>> Again, what specific topics should we discuss?
>> We’ve been told to expect 3 drafts: on general concepts, BSD 
>> implementation, & communication granularity. What’s worth 
>> discussing?
>> Michio Honda HotNets paper “PASTE: Network Stacks Must Integrate 
>> with NVMM Abstractions 
>> <http://www.ht.sfc.keio.ac.jp/%7Emicchie/papers/paste-hotnets16.pdf>”
>>
>> “These days I'm working on networking interface for non-volatile 
>> main memory (a.k.a. persistent memory and storage-class memory), 
>> because with such devices networking stack/API becomes a bottleneck 
>> in the end-to-end communication that involves persistent media (disk 
>> or SSDs for now). I saw some post-socket discussion in the minutes of 
>> the last meeting, so I wonder if this type of work could give some 
>> useful information to IETFers who design new transport API 
>> standards.”
>> Is there interest in this topic? AFAIK, there’s no Internet Draft. 
>> I will inquire whether Michio intends to submit one.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taps mailing list
>> Taps@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps