Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

[boza <[e-mail]>]

Hi All,

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Michael Welzl <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I think it's time to level up and have a discussion about "policy" and how
> it relates to TAPS.
>
> I'm going to leave the definition of "policy" here deliberately vague with
> the hope that we can start to build some terminology around it at the
> meeting.
>
>
> +1 to having a general discussion on the topic of policy (both
> application-specified and system-specified), likely following onto the
> presentation of intents. Getting a formal set of definitions would really
> help moving forward in our discussions.
>
>
> +1 from me too.
>
> BTW, NEAT already has quite an elaborate policy system built in. Naeem
> gave a high-level look at it at the last meeting:
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-
> 98-taps-42-neat-naeem-khademi-00.pdf  (slides 6/7)
>
> More details are here:
> https://www.neat-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/
> commag16-accepted-version.pdf
> This says “until published”, but I think this has just happened:
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7945852/
>
> I'd be happy join the discussion on policy aspects (unfortunately, only
remotely). As Michael mentioned, the implemented NEAT policy system is
fairly flexible. The most up-to-date documentation can be found on the NEAT
GitHub <https://github.com/NEAT-project/neat/blob/master/policy/README.md>
pages.
Let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers,
Zdravko