Re: [Taps] Prague agenda planning

[Tommy Pauly <[e-mail]>]

Hi Aaron,

We have a draft we’ll be publishing in the next week that does a survey of Transport Security protocols, and the interfaces they expose to the transport layer as well as applications. We’d like to have a slot to discuss this topic with the WG.

Thanks,
Tommy

> On Jun 27, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Aaron Falk <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Here the short list of topics recently raised for our next meeting and some questions/comments. Please respond and suggest any other topics.
> 
> draft-gjessing-taps-minset-05.txt
> 
> There’s been some interesting discussion on the draft. Are there any specific topics we should set aside time to discuss?
> Socket Intents
> 
> Again, what specific topics should we discuss?
> We’ve been told to expect 3 drafts: on general concepts, BSD implementation, & communication granularity. What’s worth discussing?
> Michio Honda HotNets paper “PASTE: Network Stacks Must Integrate with NVMM Abstractions <http://www.ht.sfc.keio.ac.jp/%7Emicchie/papers/paste-hotnets16.pdf>”
> 
> “These days I'm working on networking interface for non-volatile main memory (a.k.a. persistent memory and storage-class memory), because with such devices networking stack/API becomes a bottleneck in the end-to-end communication that involves persistent media (disk or SSDs for now). I saw some post-socket discussion in the minutes of the last meeting, so I wonder if this type of work could give some useful information to IETFers who design new transport API standards.”
> Is there interest in this topic? AFAIK, there’s no Internet Draft. I will inquire whether Michio intends to submit one.
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps