Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Thu, 12 September 2013 13:31 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A14F21E80DA for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.345
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.253, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5XyywAuVJtE for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1438221E80D0 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r8CDVY3e032224; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:31:34 +0200
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: 'Manuel Gorius' <gorius@nt.uni-saarland.de>
References: <017d01cead79$25240a10$6f6c1e30$@unizar.es> <AA275F59-30E3-4671-B1A5-3E808DC73EE0@nt.uni-saarland.de> <002d01ceae30$0e3460e0$2a9d22a0$@unizar.es> <EE48F51E-FFCF-4ADD-9C34-B4E131834844@nt.uni-saarland.de>
In-Reply-To: <EE48F51E-FFCF-4ADD-9C34-B4E131834844@nt.uni-saarland.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:31:38 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <00ec01ceafbc$692c5ab0$3b851010$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00ED_01CEAFCD.2CB6D860"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-language: es
Thread-index: AQHuvPs5z3YNAt6hhH28PKho2tIgMgDdQFaPAxTcTRUBRZLleJlYOgnw
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:31:48 -0000
Hi, Manuel. I have been reading some of your papers. This is the idea I have got: - You have proposed and implemented a new transport protocol (Predictably Reliable Realtime Transport protocol, PRRT), which would be useful for providing the reliability required by multimedia services under their specific delay constraint. - It is "designed for high-rate and low-latency media services over lossy network infrastructures". - So the first use is video transmission, I think. Can some of the ideas be useful for TCM-TF? As a first question, TCM-TF can only optimize small-packet flows (VoIP, online games, sensor networks, M2M), which usually have low bandwidth requirements, and at the same time require low latency. So the considered services are not the same. You talk about "the question of transport reliability for such multiplexed packet flows". So, are you proposing the possibility of using some of these ideas for improving the reliability of multiplexed flows? Thanks! Jose De: Manuel Gorius [mailto:gorius@nt.uni-saarland.de] Enviado el: martes, 10 de septiembre de 2013 17:08 Para: jsaldana@unizar.es CC: tcmtf@ietf.org Asunto: Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose, Thank you for your interest. We had set up a project website providing literature and a Linux kernel module implementing our "Predictably Reliable Real-time Protocol": http://www.nt.uni-saarland.de/en/projects/running-projects/prrt.html For a quick technical overview I'd like to point you on a poster presentation available under: http://www.nt.uni-saarland.de/fileadmin/file_uploads/projects/prrt/PRRT_Post er.pdf Please let me know if any of the implemented ideas are suitable for the TCM-TF. Best regards, Manuel On 10.09.2013, at 16:14, "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote: Manuel, It sounds good. Could you please provide the link to some documentation (e.g. a paper, a report) about the "predictably reliable" error control scheme? Thanks! Jose De: Manuel Gorius [mailto:gorius@ <http://nt.uni-saarland.de> nt.uni-sa <http://nt.uni-saarland.de> arland.de] Enviado el: martes, 10 de septiembre de 2013 14:30 Para: <mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es> jsaldana@unizar.es CC: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org> tcmtf@ietf.org Asunto: Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Dear Jose, It was nice to follow the ideas brought up during the TCM-TF BoF. I think that a related standard might become important in near future since besides online gaming there is also a plenty of upcoming interactive and sensor applications that would be sending small parameter updates (think of smart factory applications for instance or even e-health services). I highly appreciate the decision to move the focus away from TCP. Given TCP's limited efficiency for interactive applications, the concerns of potential impact on its performance should not put an innovation bottleneck in front of new ideas improving transport efficiency. During the BoF session the question of transport reliability for such multiplexed packet flows was raised. This would be a point where our lab could contribute. We developed a "predictably reliable" error control scheme that operates under strict delay constraints. The scheme would particularly benefit from the larger packets and the higher aggregate data rate of the multiplexed packet flows. If such error control would be considered beneficial in TCM-TF, I'd be happy to become active. Best regards, Manuel Gorius On 09.09.2013, at 18:25, Jose Saldana < <mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es> jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote: Dear all, As you may know, we had a TCM-TF BoF in IETF87 Berlin ( <http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf). As a result of the BoF, it was clear (IMHO) that there is some interest on the topic. There were a number of people who thought that a WG should be created, and several people also volunteered for reviewing documents. However, in the BoF it was also clear that there are some concerns that have to be issued before chartering. The main one is the interaction between TCM optimization and TCP mechanisms. Since TCP controls its rate depending on the RTT, the addition of a multiplexing delay may modify and even harm TCP behavior. As a consequence, we are going to redefine the Charter, removing the optimization of TCP. So RTP/UDP and UDP will be the considered options for optimization. We would like to get more people involved in the discussion, so we would like to invite those who actively participate on Transport Area discussion to join the mailing list <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf, in order to get their feedback. Thanks in advance, Jose Saldana _______________________________________________ tcmtf mailing list <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org> tcmtf@ietf.org <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf _______________________________________________ tcmtf mailing list <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org> tcmtf@ietf.org <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf
- [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF - TCP gorry
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius