Re: [tcpm] draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-00

Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> Thu, 24 June 2010 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA973A63CB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pOpqoTOo-hPn for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.7.73]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57553A6A39 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0L4I00J1HCP3SB20@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for tcpm@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:27:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.53,472,1272837600"; d="sig'?scan'208"; a="62629970"
Received: from relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay-auth-2) ([134.130.7.79]) by ironport-in-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:27:03 +0200
Received: from miami.nets.rwth-aachen.de ([unknown] [137.226.12.180]) by relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9 2008)) with ESMTPA id <0L4I00HNBCP3XR30@relay-auth-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for tcpm@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:27:03 +0200 (CEST)
Content-type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-556999807
From: Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
In-reply-to: <2262C708-DF9A-4DD9-9378-D84C5AF330AC@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:27:06 +0200
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-id: <2A54056F-DA38-4196-B0F0-6A767A5AF4E9@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <20100609151532.8E75E28C0D0@core3.amsl.com> <33D3BDE9-7E8D-4DF0-B8D5-BFFC66CF9C99@nokia.com> <2262C708-DF9A-4DD9-9378-D84C5AF330AC@nokia.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-00
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:26:58 -0000

Am 24.06.2010 um 08:40 schrieb Lars Eggert:

> Hi,
> 
> since we're not meeting in Maastricht,

:-(

> I might as well ask this now: Do folks believe we should go forward with making these extensions historic?

Ja/yes/oui

> In that case, I'll ask the chairs to do a consensus poll on adopting this document as a WG work item.
> 
> Lars

Alex

> 
> On 2010-6-9, at 19:28, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> Filename:	 draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize
>>> Revision:	 00
>>> Title:		 Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC1072, RFC1106, RFC1110, RFC1145, RFC1146, RFC1263, RFC1379, RFC1644 and RFC1693 to Historic Status
>>> Creation_date:	 2010-06-09
>>> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
>>> Number_of_pages: 4
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> This document recommends that several TCP extensions that have never
>>> seen widespread use be moved to Historic status.  The affected RFCs
>>> are RFC1072, RFC1106, RFC1110, RFC1145, RFC1146, RFC1263, RFC1379,
>>> RFC1644 and RFC1693.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm