IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-00

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 09 June 2010 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985803A67AB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZgiF2UgvypZ for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8338D3A699E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTA/OBSwtBIy3MqfZKtendfyQPur3JBkj@postini.com; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:23:17 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:19:56 -0700
Received: from [172.28.134.21] (172.28.134.21) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:19:55 -0400
Message-ID: <4C0FCD39.6090703@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:19:53 -0400
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <20100609151532.8E75E28C0D0@core3.amsl.com> <33D3BDE9-7E8D-4DF0-B8D5-BFFC66CF9C99@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <33D3BDE9-7E8D-4DF0-B8D5-BFFC66CF9C99@nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [tcpm] draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize-00
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:23:16 -0000

I applaud this effort. I think that we should all take a sweep through
our registries and RFCs to get rid of some old cruft.

                                             Ron


On 6/9/2010 12:28 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Quite possibly the most boring RFC ever. But at least it's short. Comments welcome.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
>> Filename:	 draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize
>> Revision:	 00
>> Title:		 Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC1072, RFC1106, RFC1110, RFC1145, RFC1146, RFC1263, RFC1379, RFC1644 and RFC1693 to Historic Status
>> Creation_date:	 2010-06-09
>> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
>> Number_of_pages: 4
>>
>> Abstract:
>> This document recommends that several TCP extensions that have never
>> seen widespread use be moved to Historic status.  The affected RFCs
>> are RFC1072, RFC1106, RFC1110, RFC1145, RFC1146, RFC1263, RFC1379,
>> RFC1644 and RFC1693.
> 
> Lars

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email