IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 15 June 2020 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80663A09AF for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BYQD7VN9e7bI for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9D93A099F for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id i16so11471648qtr.7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=mLNwC8zcjfF0QbCYntYICvxL8/Q+yCFyyICeamixfrs=; b=twqK+9lV3SToJLeiZ8f/3K//SOxZw6M1JxEVfEppTmGI6DWEUIzIPNnWVIK6fwcfk4 5NN170GCf2MVWUXze/cxkw++vIsygdDlEYUftzQMOb8hXJ85u5zNkeJZzIOkrin4ZlVc NM1Q2Sz1QYqgcfSF3qz4E7Xmj7dYZsrY8y0mR5wTOadAnZlckz8m3x9N4I9CwWaPSp1d XH/0o1XEjk5hHVIGitZp1nf42UPEhRJlhL941ACHWULffw7+QbVMX8Z3cy5AZkBTsUWt ZHY+ly35mi94yNGWtRCHHEagGDmcAcjJuVyuT2CmLMBtpw+8Cy7A1YkaAuq8Z/AkXg8O eMqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=mLNwC8zcjfF0QbCYntYICvxL8/Q+yCFyyICeamixfrs=; b=CseewqiZpfnvBJGI0nKfzcRXVg6KnaS11cHACG3XdvKNIMXDiN38wqVcgM8BdbhvOO 0vu4/1+8MqqrMpmmpejkwNARGPw7HUXpQZPBMFTJVpGN2L9gRA1tyj1wvJKLdUwSdZ1v /eOcGeq/PmMkW5h+YtZfkmDQsxDrVkl6GZNXM5kvJ1vFyAuNJ9TwCXbfBKoA5ApzP40s cxEPqQk3Bz6TtQck9fDZHoCH3vUVRi5nvnkK25Ns4lNAnwOdIKHLbg6ZzmHrzOskat91 7pV7i7hOz7WewMnvOqwyMaSOu3CRe0nMKadF/UlHnPu0F9WBZK5Q/W/O+eP4oz+rDYy/ 2J+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hOz203DeI2GOwCgLk20qg3+DKKSpAxzrY4GKlpBOf0Endzwyz mJjIFz9cN5liOhawWVuUhFUjpPd8Ow8swA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7eoZPl0SwvFO+9AFESHEA0xAbNM+pJuYnmSgjCoWtj1lwFjQQ9g6NsmsKJ/8loMVkfBLuJw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1b58:: with SMTP id p24mr13044303qtk.320.1592187544276; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (user-12l31c7.cable.mindspring.com. [69.81.133.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v2sm10345973qtq.8.2020.06.14.19.19.03 for <tcpm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <158981133458.2481.15195759097492819350@ietfa.amsl.com> <5ECFE791.3050400@btconnect.com> <055C1A6F-3EA9-4695-869F-BDE0A4943BE5@icsi.berkeley.edu> <5ED0F22E.1070402@btconnect.com> <7CD0EF44-D26A-4F85-AA6A-91D3C55B44AC@icir.org> <5ED244F7.7030307@btconnect.com> <9AF1F719-7F29-4080-99E8-C0AB83DF1FF9@icir.org> <1UWAyt4aeg.1UCdKrbr8wj@pc8xp> <7534662C-6B13-4788-BD1F-F89B404C1088@icir.org> <DB7PR07MB5340CD431F596B63A812A360A2850@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAM4esxR_2x-kfwx3Ko_B+BKKEzMRBLTVBosvFpdyv2ZuVh1XNA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53401B7092F57A088CED3552A2810@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <4D84E94A-7535-4090-BE39-FB2ED242C9CA@icir.org> <5EE3A35B.6000108@btconnect.com> <31294BB6-351B-4C6A-8B9F-9F2C0F81BD08@icir.org> <53272B96-995D-4092-B671-4E507F41CC03@tzi.org> <57A18915-E1DC-4652-942E-4287BABB9C71@strayalpha.com> <AM0PR07MB5329DEC6E97947E4FECF29DEA29E0@AM0PR07MB5329.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <249D22CE-8D2F-483B-839D-6C2B0C627E30@icir.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <c99a5430-11bf-a4ed-9bce-39f70efa143d@mti-systems.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 22:19:01 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <249D22CE-8D2F-483B-839D-6C2B0C627E30@icir.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/2xCcXfM--Z6kbeib97Dpzmmaixk>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 02:19:19 -0000

On 6/13/2020 9:02 AM, Mark Allman wrote:
>> Taking 'our draft' as 2140bis then yes that aspect of it is
>> correct - if it were not then I would not have cited it as an
>> example of the text that should be there.  But 793bis has the out
>> of date boilerplate so since this going to the TCPM list I was
>> hoping Wesley would notice it and act on it:-)
> oh my.
>
> it'd be way helpful if i could stop reading this thread.  i have
> known joe & wes a long time and can pretty confidently say that none
> of us are mind readers.  if you have something to say, say it.  if
> you don't, please stop saying stuff.
>
> NITS that take a friggin' thread to untangle are NOT WORTH IT.
> seriously.


Now that I've had time to read this thread and catch up, I see what 
needs to be done for 793bis and will take care of it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email