IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Fri, 12 June 2020 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9F93A08EC for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9Ne4-C3-pqs for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C09933A08F9 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id v13so8032013otp.4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=8bgCi8D6NEYDs7rrLHLwPUyP2QnimTDRvLW3+nikRnY=; b=AZa3eyVsGHnPDdQFE+P2C2QvK7s4Nrjx4siD0T2/A6H/NE7Q7e9NmpJX0uMEwbxlWP FCyjxEVhp9rjy++KsrT/Sqd8lwFyWyc/cARilIO6nPfmCloav9SSvKyOxK2KaDTTDNFk Dht29Mt4feMT3MA/F4kBlQrfMUAO6hcQp5U7PXsXgu1LEFMIbjeTrDfBufQvQRR4Hhrf zOZqoPWTgg3occG3JoCrMHOnDPb8iGy2zkkjSnRvzeyHr16YxcUc7iVeh/cnNEQ4Ibnj FWXeQ3IENpDIWV980my3HNVNaPKOm76j96pyZ45N7OJTuJbC+P+hOIF/q9Xt+1Dy7LWi cYNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531f3BsHswF5VMKcBsK4ONMe95rqDEY44BuZgBw+d/Bsd7QgBOPc bKwka9cRnsAay8wVfAo19UWKEw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwaKWvDLtM4hcHfdu9gq2QiiKLywdQQXU71kcT3DiChlJ/Aw+9eKtbWi05ooHAfP7kNz54UQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7f93:: with SMTP id t19mr11914441otp.347.1591985163065; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.244] ([2600:1700:b380:3f00:45e2:3047:889f:766b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e11sm1512561oou.31.2020.06.12.11.06.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider@ietf.org, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:05:55 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <FF5266C9-BE77-435A-BC81-E790DE8FE22D@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <53272B96-995D-4092-B671-4E507F41CC03@tzi.org>
References: <158981133458.2481.15195759097492819350@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB7PR07MB53406A74483D8123C75ADD70A28E0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5ECFE791.3050400@btconnect.com> <055C1A6F-3EA9-4695-869F-BDE0A4943BE5@icsi.berkeley.edu> <5ED0F22E.1070402@btconnect.com> <7CD0EF44-D26A-4F85-AA6A-91D3C55B44AC@icir.org> <5ED244F7.7030307@btconnect.com> <9AF1F719-7F29-4080-99E8-C0AB83DF1FF9@icir.org> <1UWAyt4aeg.1UCdKrbr8wj@pc8xp> <7534662C-6B13-4788-BD1F-F89B404C1088@icir.org> <DB7PR07MB5340CD431F596B63A812A360A2850@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAM4esxR_2x-kfwx3Ko_B+BKKEzMRBLTVBosvFpdyv2ZuVh1XNA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53401B7092F57A088CED3552A2810@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <4D84E94A-7535-4090-BE39-FB2ED242C9CA@icir.org> <5EE3A35B.6000108@btconnect.com> <31294BB6-351B-4C6A-8B9F-9F2C0F81BD08@icir.org> <53272B96-995D-4092-B671-4E507F41CC03@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_5FAB56DE-7A68-4F84-86B8-6B165CA3033E_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Yl4HUnjWUEQBV76L57Gy20x-BUE>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:06:08 -0000

> The text you want to use is on page 3 of RFC 8174, which now is
> BCP 14 together with RFC 2119.

oh.  thank you for clearing that up.

> (Tom: When making comments to a draft, it helps to do those in a
> way that can be understood by the authors.)

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email