IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Sat, 13 June 2020 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mallman@icsi.berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8847D3A0872 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZykJSJVcX79a for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (mail-ot1-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D2A3A0850 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 97so9546966otg.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=duzn6wgx+24dOqoG85bxDaUuaIvI9MjIequUH7dNvZs=; b=eaZNsLYs3ZdbqiWDQIalPibqKR/r6uY7LvheeTvTYSdWpR3JQ0TNAPDA41uDhyjG/v +SFO0dwiCqLmh6zuDUQ5dKJzjXNo5MvlDnoswwjs3P8Ie9ltAduFexSpwwsuWaHK2p+x 575mAe/cVSXTXBnZkrJn82JGmP1HTw14eE55cvpjbqRKwJo2pPHz17VUUCJc8Xf3VOvc wjSnc+xERPxkqUbflgMfRuzRS7IjyxTyMa/jJfaTGs8b2HWE+MNxwFIl4zU2HoDe+nV8 1qMYIlCwIfcFJzRegDdDYQ+6pbxkXILJLPj28h51e/hxd/svoNpe2bRQghCmXdE/jxba Kxag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533s9ET6Y7680WzDVuhE3WlsOVnUMilTT2Gv2gZSN/eh/MEcw9C0 Gqc/x1kfVn64wMqnhiGailj/Cg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5QC+m+EQ/2xFY6dqhBzU9GGeDJjgfaKxmXq+MujD76Z4Amj2FGL5Di6TMBtrg0qT+zB5qyA==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2ca:: with SMTP id 68mr14040644otl.298.1592053362537; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.244] ([2600:1700:b380:3f00:3165:85:27da:c1db]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g126sm2087470oia.41.2020.06.13.06.02.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:02:40 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <249D22CE-8D2F-483B-839D-6C2B0C627E30@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB5329DEC6E97947E4FECF29DEA29E0@AM0PR07MB5329.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <158981133458.2481.15195759097492819350@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB7PR07MB53406A74483D8123C75ADD70A28E0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5ECFE791.3050400@btconnect.com> <055C1A6F-3EA9-4695-869F-BDE0A4943BE5@icsi.berkeley.edu> <5ED0F22E.1070402@btconnect.com> <7CD0EF44-D26A-4F85-AA6A-91D3C55B44AC@icir.org> <5ED244F7.7030307@btconnect.com> <9AF1F719-7F29-4080-99E8-C0AB83DF1FF9@icir.org> <1UWAyt4aeg.1UCdKrbr8wj@pc8xp> <7534662C-6B13-4788-BD1F-F89B404C1088@icir.org> <DB7PR07MB5340CD431F596B63A812A360A2850@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAM4esxR_2x-kfwx3Ko_B+BKKEzMRBLTVBosvFpdyv2ZuVh1XNA@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53401B7092F57A088CED3552A2810@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <4D84E94A-7535-4090-BE39-FB2ED242C9CA@icir.org> <5EE3A35B.6000108@btconnect.com> <31294BB6-351B-4C6A-8B9F-9F2C0F81BD08@icir.org> <53272B96-995D-4092-B671-4E507F41CC03@tzi.org> <57A18915-E1DC-4652-942E-4287BABB9C71@strayalpha.com> <AM0PR07MB5329DEC6E97947E4FECF29DEA29E0@AM0PR07MB5329.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_2968757D-108B-4E22-87C5-0A863DC992CC_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/7ICc8iKkWo7PPCdhBoQjwoYWz2I>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-14.txt> (Requirements for Time-Based Loss Detection) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:02:47 -0000

> Taking 'our draft' as 2140bis then yes that aspect of it is
> correct - if it were not then I would not have cited it as an
> example of the text that should be there.  But 793bis has the out
> of date boilerplate so since this going to the TCPM list I was
> hoping Wesley would notice it and act on it:-)

oh my.

it'd be way helpful if i could stop reading this thread.  i have
known joe & wes a long time and can pretty confidently say that none
of us are mind readers.  if you have something to say, say it.  if
you don't, please stop saying stuff.

NITS that take a friggin' thread to untangle are NOT WORTH IT.
seriously.

allman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email