IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Tuning TCP parameters for the 21st century

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Fri, 17 July 2009 06:30 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0618D3A6C92 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YbShFCqgPMjR for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out2.uio.no (mail-out2.uio.no [129.240.10.58]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A01F3A68BE for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out2.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1MRgxl-0002PU-Dc for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:30:33 +0200
Received: from div-8021x-dhcp050.uio.no ([193.157.176.59]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1MRgxl-0001Rt-0y for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:30:33 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <d1c2719f0907161936y5d46d883q25507cfe935b17cc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d1c2719f0907131619t1a80997ep4080a3a721ef3627@mail.gmail.com> <d1c2719f0907141241p73e605adqc1d2e6f0db4eb3aa@mail.gmail.com> <4A5CE3D0.5000904@isi.edu> <d1c2719f0907141532i31d2b740hfa32209a8ccb156@mail.gmail.com> <4A5D0E8F.1040402@isi.edu> <d1c2719f0907141743n4952c9far54e3be36668577ed@mail.gmail.com> <4A5DE6BC.3090904@isi.edu> <7261633966bb7a55cebd4ce313069082.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> <4A5E018C.8030604@isi.edu> <1247733589.4184.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> <d1c2719f0907161936y5d46d883q25507cfe935b17cc@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:30:45 +0200
Message-Id: <1247812245.4167.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-10.fc7)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 1 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 3 sum msgs/h 3 total rcpts 1975 max rcpts/h 33 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, none, uiobl=NO, uiouri=_URIID_)
X-UiO-Scanned: 06026CA03F46E0341512D16DF4A6058FACF6EE9E
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 193.157.176.59 spam_score: 0 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 492 max/h 15 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Tuning TCP parameters for the 21st century
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:30:44 -0000

So, after some data have been mentioned, can we
get back to this question:

On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 19:36 -0700, Jerry Chu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:39 AM, Michael Welzl<michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> >> > - but what about retransmitting SYN/ACKs faster?
> >> > Since the other side already sent a SYN, it probably
> >> > isn't overloaded

?

Cheers,
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email