Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: support for NATs

Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> Mon, 11 August 2008 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FCE3A69EE; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62B73A6801 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YY+7i7MyA072 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (romeo.rtfm.com [74.95.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481CB3A69CA for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (localhost.rtfm.com [127.0.0.1]) by romeo.rtfm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B300B50846; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:42:14 -0700
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <48A08295.8090903@juniper.net>
References: <4890F4BE.6060302@isi.edu> <396556a20807301622l4cb33deuff73cd13d7a75ba1@mail.gmail.com> <4890FBE8.1020203@isi.edu> <396556a20807311700w1eda50b0o5da7ae52e6c1691a@mail.gmail.com> <48935FFD.4090805@isi.edu> <396556a20808051826w1a839577q956f379f56db1165@mail.gmail.com> <20080806020257.D1C69525D8F@kilo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808061742y19f8f5fh78fe66bfe4d415be@mail.gmail.com> <20080807011812.DDC8050846@romeo.rtfm.com> <396556a20808071047q5bda8acbje7a8fc9f9bf2e597@mail.gmail.com> <20080807180512.77604529E4D@kilo.rtfm.com> <489B3B72.8030604@isi.edu> <48A08295.8090903@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Message-Id: <20080811184214.B300B50846@romeo.rtfm.com>
Cc: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>, tcpm@ietf.org, Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] tcp-auth-opt issue: support for NATs
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

At Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:19:01 -0400,
Ron Bonica wrote:
> 
> 
> > That's a reason we have a keyID, which, together with the socket pair,
> > should exactly specify what key to use and avoids this sort of trial.
> 
> Amen!
> 
>   If
> > we can live with trials, we can remove the keyID and things align much
> > better.
> > 
> 
> But we can't!

If we can't ever have trial authentication than there must be a unique
key for each (key-id, remote addr) pair. As a practical matter,
this implies either that:

- Key-ids must be globally unique.
- You need to know the other side's IP address, even if you're doing
  a passive open.

-Ekr
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm