IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] TCP EDO and SYN-EXT-OPT finalization - request for discussion

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 12 October 2021 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FCC3A0597 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HAS_X_OUTGOING_SPAM_STAT=0.544, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XhRO_fmPFCuB for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-5.web-hosting.com (server217-5.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 063363A058F for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:Message-Id:Subject:Date:Mime-Version: Content-Type:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6dV8Ht9mm0flGUMOJ3CSQCDirVf6nCKMq9XaCcOWZuI=; b=dvogfQQfiKWSMgsCPCvW9zZeV+ 7ejgAnqkPfsU1TMyTr5TpDD6GAd5Ge71pPmH7MkliNWIY65OTHzcrI2ykaIUlpkuv6k8cZQLBd+VU dLO82lN40VabnHMz4ObkSxLEw5usQbDrmoISrjs9NcLgvEPLbLHt4x1HGQ/QAF3QjuDN+9OUkFI3E MPNi7i3O1aRO4//nqKRUxCiaQ80HxJPNxpYa5/3pG07StnMcndP/9K4v+kN2DJX93/A97NylVottc mRomqX7ULLBGFrRqDujU62edj1mAKU1Jp4amRpULZ1XgoOGpNNZ27e85nYNqndcm97hRZRbxV6SRX OPp3movg==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:50389 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1maNmv-008J89-BC; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:50:17 -0400
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B9954AA-37F7-48E3-9F89-174BC704AE7A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:50:12 -0700
Message-Id: <0FF01EB8-C286-481D-9694-673DC3C59C7A@strayalpha.com>
To: tcpm <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Zz30X4dQYKMc6EwtNtCbtTqOBIQ>
Subject: [tcpm] TCP EDO and SYN-EXT-OPT finalization - request for discussion
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:50:24 -0000

Hi, all,

I’d like to see what we can do to get TCP EDO out the door as well as SYN-EXT-OPT:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-syn-ext-opt <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-syn-ext-opt>

The latter would be experimental and both are not recommended for widespread deployment or default use. They both do, IMO, document the key issues in extending the TCP option space for both post-SYN and SYN segments, so they should still be useful to complete.

I would like to ask the WG:

- are there any open issues or pending suggestions to TCP EDO to prepare it for last call?

- would the WG like to adopt SYN-EXT-OPT as experimental as well or would it be preferred (and OK) to submit this as individual/experimental if not?

Comments on either doc or the above questions welcome.

Thanks, all,
Joe

—
Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email