IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101

"Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.scharf@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E63912D890; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 05:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBKdGqkMSnPi; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 05:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr10128.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.1.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37AC12711B; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 05:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=JxF9nGQji0hnL5//zV4W1nYLZCX2kMEeV0Dc602kAFA=; b=UJxjxSjYFH3LcnAWQG8tI/X8o1HzLgJcYTnV6IGveGDLK/930vfOapoZdUo896eU6uegCxy/5C/HChCL4J6tu8PQnWp5WoMlRYzCQ+RqBqQsobwHo+Umgb1I20weROm5YmBEW/4C7cjb75dtoM5W6s2m/rVrqj8pGfRpZp9qccg=
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.173.92.15) by AM5PR0701MB3010.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.156.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.588.7; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:10:51 +0000
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4935:9288:dcd6:7db0]) by AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4935:9288:dcd6:7db0%5]) with mapi id 15.20.0588.013; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:10:50 +0000
From: "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>
To: "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
CC: "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org" <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101
Thread-Index: AQHTurUcZ7Bbr5f2+0mNSWNaOIB+wqPN/QuAgAAQyYCAAAJfAA==
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:10:50 +0000
Message-ID: <AM5PR0701MB254762B75AA387BE89EB505693D20@AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <A1F61D20-1911-4A6E-9F80-A1DF1EF91816@huawei.com> <AM5PR0701MB254755BA63E33173CC7C7BCE93DB0@AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5A9BEB65.6010102@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CABY-gOO8sH3+5qfFj7DV6wh6+uX8CyBfwo4FBLi=9x1RngQDHg@mail.gmail.com> <AM5PR0701MB25474AC4A52E38B43E543FA193DA0@AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABY-gOMJf-4GKkbmYMJScrafO44NEfy0hoq5KXJ0uVA+QUXGiA@mail.gmail.com> <430A7C48-DA1D-4D73-AB40-F2B30A8E8580@lurchi.franken.de> <5AA7A614.3050706@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <AM5PR0701MB254730C89ECA7272AE9288EC93D20@AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5AA7BB41.4070507@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5AA7BB41.4070507@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=michael.scharf@nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [92.203.209.190]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5PR0701MB3010; 7:bKaXl0u1j6GhqzQnWKv1YKbYRZJHd31kLMxd4pIy5PkAzROvG6bEV2HRz+uHoTYdqwQkUj1stuFosHKgB0psVJazdxKfJxWU9vzCaWqIpa2YFP8hNe18gQDCdrM94xemkbtoGdWm+IYtaC7Kz7OsX3xbpW8zq+JBiPCz+NbUUXwhuEUiu3taYwNm8WpuXKdskte1JIyceXJJ+4mg8qJ3pFVYQYXKD99UfiWvIut0ERQsWLJw6ceXt2BAYeObgJym
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3b430008-f05a-45c9-120e-08d588db767d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB3010;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5PR0701MB3010:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM5PR0701MB301026281A439E682FA6E63293D20@AM5PR0701MB3010.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(35073007944872);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(3231221)(11241501184)(806099)(944501244)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201703031522075)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:AM5PR0701MB3010; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB3010;
x-forefront-prvs: 0610D16BBE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(346002)(39380400002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(14454004)(7696005)(9686003)(74316002)(305945005)(33656002)(478600001)(76176011)(99286004)(186003)(66066001)(6506007)(26005)(97736004)(86362001)(2906002)(5250100002)(2501003)(5660300001)(102836004)(68736007)(8936002)(4326008)(2900100001)(2351001)(3660700001)(2950100002)(6916009)(3846002)(6116002)(8676002)(81166006)(1730700003)(81156014)(3280700002)(6246003)(7736002)(6436002)(5640700003)(55016002)(93886005)(561944003)(25786009)(229853002)(296002)(54906003)(105586002)(106356001)(316002)(53936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB3010; H:AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AQw3HZ8qi6f00skZpEg02o7BvD5UcS/x7/dt4wF9Z7SaJBtLDHjfuRvugofAbmHsNSahgFNUxDQkORZToWNieUs2RE/5BHu7QqMHWd2cae5YWv/wgNAKPmYWTObmP3uD9N2U0vGHtZFNJUG+FSt9gbRqZdGI2hczCMrOyiM8IwxlCaNqPuhzGSk+3M34LGAcCjm6Sl1ESA0BluKtNL+cKpkUB1QJmpe7TwTvpHtpkrQ2kznIcvxErUCl0Txkz4tuDWrkrPVmOZteEGujCTI5Vs3jxU0B/m/+46khHQIZmeA+gcN5rAr8IXGSAjF/jnhj+5PDtx/N6c/cFuhLnI/MFIc4cnhxDlUrktVfQq1Ge0TIQcW0zlF7XnpJ7ooyuEcD
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3b430008-f05a-45c9-120e-08d588db767d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Mar 2018 12:10:50.8055 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB3010
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/s_3K_U_pbJKXLJ9Flhe1ljzpicg>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 12:10:56 -0000

> Actually, to be more clear --- I am **NOT** against some sort of evolution in
> the network, and figuring out how best transports interact with this.
> 
> I still have people working on this, I see newer router designs as more
> inviting, I still see appetite to do this. But like you, I **KNOW** there some
> big obtsacles and pitfalls. I am wondering how best to bring this sort of work
> to the IETF and get good perspective on the problems and solutions. After
> PLUS was short down by Privacy, I'd hate the next new thing to be shot down
> for the wrong reason.

Without a buy-in from RTG and OPS area, I believe this sort of ideas won't get far in the IETF.

For what it is worth, I attend a lot of RTG and OPS sessions. My impression is that it may not be trivial to bridge the gap between TSV and RTG communities. But this is what would actually be required to make such a proposal successful.

Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email