Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 04 March 2018 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279B5120727; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 12:59:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id APvykZHj_yXG; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 12:59:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0301201F2; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 12:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y137so18360527qka.4; Sun, 04 Mar 2018 12:58:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pGE5ScbbxRhG16nt+zRu9k5qwqSwzU12FNpvTHQ9pXw=; b=Z76WE4KNyOr19jtAvTXvE2Euh56oWUyFXRzVpLzSbLzdT74X3D2Zn23pnHoBpwc6XX xugArpl7nloADUDtGIO5Sf4NRAcjS7VRHpgUBO/QklcNenPU5Hpy030wloWPPlJ0DwdL qlkANkJDsbMq74JWU85wdMBh22HaYqYIa1ufbKuKNUQcXLPPMbwPfJEYDIYEJnXSRNyO 35P67mHLFbrv6106im7GIjhgdSrg9IXGpZpTMiA7vNMklvWlt//WRI0WYKQU2hpAYiJ0 aFrFo2CCSZRyUoONgj2aLWz6vjBAskO6ZPCD3rOpeZCf1cUGnFIwLyWjl3OfKlNBdMRD yhNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pGE5ScbbxRhG16nt+zRu9k5qwqSwzU12FNpvTHQ9pXw=; b=eAotmaZxb5aYALU1MFTZG/kl+fIRrdezGwQgGx/94ARtgNepvbKRuywJ8zMigAHrNv 2Rz4rBKM9UP+uUY8YmipHn3InyXMd85KuaKCB0kK5EE0+BfVSr/2vQZbofFaCbsUPsus vOQNP/FS+5Yb06AY9Suc9mK1meZ3dj+/INkiuSkFK8s45R9vckzgQL6ekLDAP4Jxlk/O xXnzw5tmW0sESqqhCxrBT1TAbs9FAusyZ9lOoVHPQPn4U6phqOlbBsLsypItEz7Tkq64 hr7XICcgT88ZRhyh/3pQ3ui/13Hc7ndRu3l1kDxELaiN4WiGRgZgItDH7E9t2nEmBoZo 3N8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7H8xxjgRm0nHF6Qud/IMXTjY1wuQSdMz0SUAIwjvZX9ndSn1wdW T6KKP8fywdDwd6qNHMSwNYWViyuaRlA/00uidQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu3jpS+vfX/XCZ38dntbVrHHgDtJF7rompnA6rO0KtQOcqvhjfhatUlzPbXQq6ZXEUmb36zPZw0pi9VI3X0GRg=
X-Received: by 10.233.232.75 with SMTP id a72mr19382219qkg.76.1520197138791; Sun, 04 Mar 2018 12:58:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.46.10 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 12:58:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5A9BEB65.6010102@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <A1F61D20-1911-4A6E-9F80-A1DF1EF91816@huawei.com> <AM5PR0701MB254755BA63E33173CC7C7BCE93DB0@AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <5A9BEB65.6010102@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 12:58:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CABY-gOO8sH3+5qfFj7DV6wh6+uX8CyBfwo4FBLi=9x1RngQDHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Cc: "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org" <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c11019a72409705669c7a12"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/wrY62hfwzFgDuJ9MJuJB8bh7aOE>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 20:59:02 -0000

Hi Gorry and Michael,

Thanks for the suggestion, I'll request a presentation in ICCRG. Meanwhile,
I think since the in-band signaling draft was presented in TSVWG, if time
allows it still makes sense to present this draft in TSVWG.

The in-band signaling draft covers lots of aspects, and the required
changes include network layer and transport layer. We're working on
updating the draft, and may break it into pieces to fit different WGs.

Your comments and help are very much appreciated.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
wrote:

> I am unsure yet what the correct group of people world be to explore a
> "Bandwidth Guaranteed Network". The presentation last IETF looked like the
> work could imply a need for changes proposed to the network layer (using
> OAM exchnages) to set the sending rate and make those bandwidth
> reservations.  In the end, it could result in a protocol quite different to
> TCP, I think this sort of change may possibly have a home in TSVWG  - but
> first I'd agree with Michaeland would encourage a presentation of the
> problem statement in ICCRG to explore the issues.
>
> Gorry
>
> On 04/03/2018, 10:34, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> From the abstract: “…This draft proposes a new TCP congestion control
>> algorithm used in bandwidth guaranteed networks.  It is an extension to the
>> current TCP standards.”
>>
>> In the IETF, I believe the expertise for this specific document would be
>> in TCPM, which in CC. If the authors are interested in feedback on the
>> proposed mechanism, I would recommend to ask TCPM.
>>
>> Alternatively, corresponding research could perhaps be performed in the
>> ICCRG. ICCRG has published RFC 6077 to document some of the open research
>> issues in this space.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> *From:*tsvwg [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Yingzhen Qu
>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 04, 2018 6:55 AM
>> *To:* tsvwg@ietf.org; tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org
>> *Cc:* Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
>> *Subject:* [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101
>>
>> Dear Chairs,
>>
>> A new draft (The draft was suggested by TSVWG @IETF100) was just
>> submitted, and we’d like to request a time slot to present it @IETF101.
>>
>> Title:A New Congestion Control in Bandwidth Guaranteed Network
>>
>> Presenter: Yingzhen Qu (Huawei)
>>
>> Time required (including Q/A): 10 mins
>>
>> Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-han-tsvwg-cc/
>>
>> If there is any question, please kindly let us know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yingzhen
>>
>>
>