Re: Re IP over Satellite
jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer) Tue, 16 June 1998 19:10 UTC
X-Authentication-Warning: assateague.lerc.nasa.gov: listserv set sender to owner-tcppep@lerc.nasa.gov using -f
Message-Id: <m0ym17W-00020PC@mailbox.reptiles.org>
From: jim@reptiles.org
Subject: Re: Re IP over Satellite
To: border@hns.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:10:14 -0400
Cc: tcppep@lerc.nasa.gov, tcp-over-satellite@achtung.sp.trw.com
In-Reply-To: <980616121454.ZM19265@pes11.hns.com> from John Border at "Jun 16, 98 12:14:54 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-tcppep@lerc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1845
Lines: 33
> My management has heard (nth-hand) that there is some kind of statement or > draft associated with the IETF that says that either IP or TCP will not work > over satellite links with delays longer than 125 milliseconds. Has anyone > heard of this or is aware of where this may have come from? It sounds like > propaganda from LEO proponents but if there is any technical merit behind such > an assertion I definately want to see it... seems to be working for me. 8^) hops 2 and 3 on either side of an E1 via intelsat 1 inet-gw (195.200.225.1) 4.773 ms 4.951 ms 4.933 ms 2 uplink.ir.tor.reliable-access.net (195.200.224.33) 570.311 ms 569.834 3 uplink.tor.reliable-access.net (195.200.224.34) 574.027 ms 574.825 ms 4 inet-gw.reliable-access.net (195.200.224.3) 580.588 ms 579.925 ms 577.605 ms 5 151-gw.reliable-access.net (195.200.224.2) 579.785 ms 577.573 ms 576.350 ms 6 205.150.89.209 (205.150.89.209) 587.287 ms 584.674 ms 578.859 ms 7 h4.bb1.tor2.h4.bb1.tor1.uunet.ca (205.150.242.65) 579.274 ms 596.515 ms 8 ns.uunet.ca (142.77.1.1) 582.198 ms 582.868 ms 582.007 ms hops 19/20 and 21 on either side of a 56K via Anik 18 br-yellowknifea.ntnet.nt.ca (199.247.2.70) 193 ms (ttl=236!) 288 ms (ttl=236!) 275 ms (ttl=236!) 19 br-ssimicro.yk.ntnet.nt.ca (199.247.57.71) 229 ms (ttl=235!) 202 ms (ttl=235!) 209 ms (ttl=235!) 20 * * * 21 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 1786 ms (ttl=233!) * 1764 ms (ttl=233!) 22 natsiq.nunanet.com (199.247.47.3) 1594 ms (ttl=232!) 1750 ms (ttl=232!) 1770 ms (ttl=232!) -- [ Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ] [ The telephone, for those of you who have forgotten, was a commonly used ] [ communications technology in the days before electronic mail. ] [ They're still easy to find in most large cities. -- Nathaniel Borenstein ]
- Re: Re IP over Satellite Hans Kruse
- Re: Re IP over Satellite Telford001
- re: Re IP over Satellite Dr. Harry Tyrer
- RE: Re IP over Satellite Hans Kruse
- RE: Re IP over Satellite Tony Hughes
- Re: Re IP over Satellite Jim Mercer
- Re: Re IP over Satellite Hans Kruse
- re: Re IP over Satellite Paul Ferguson
- RE: Re IP over Satellite Schram, Chris
- Re: Re IP over Satellite Eric Travis
- RE: Re IP over Satellite Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re IP over Satellite John Border
- re: Re IP over Satellite osama qadan