IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 03 July 2022 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323BDC14F720; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 09:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2mJ-AnbnUFYY; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 09:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6020C14F6EB; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 09:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 263GTjGZ008265; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:29:45 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDC54604A; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:29:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091BF46043; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:29:45 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:29:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (93.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.93] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 263GTiiJ004234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:29:44 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, 'Don Fedyk' <dfedyk@labn.net>
References: <CA+YzgTtkkKrbaPKidFEJfqfrsKSTDFV98LXuVd2pbk1_s4__iQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+YzgTsUJyk1WRFU=H79qxz_8it1QN57oc+qe3Jao_xo4sji3g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+YzgTtRad3KnXcrJD0A+SUgyytgVWVFnAXncqd7R9HoXvT1rw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTtRad3KnXcrJD0A+SUgyytgVWVFnAXncqd7R9HoXvT1rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 17:29:44 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <02ea01d88efa$1ad00c00$50702400$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02EB_01D88F02.7C951040"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIFEcIjH4mNsDnW1Guv6OCb7hE8dQHkSMDfAaKWf06s95jkAA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.93
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-26994.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--35.105-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--35.105-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-26994.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--35.105300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: x2HXvaraFolfsB4HYR80ZnFPUrVDm6jtx287VGn6yCYI5diVHyJV1Rq4 kacgYuN63Rq1qtW57uMGcgtee9l4fsyUH2BaQVMObApbcE5szFMpA2ExuipmWi3euai/vqCsU1y Suyq20mtUvuFi0BemlmMIQfKXNYiTYw1f/0r5B95f2SdIdby5ddmhsJODizUsYKqjwB8QwAcdhl yMCcmZOKL15TD97T9E2CtyyWtWV+qaYlNpIKBgC46MisxJraxHV2y0V2O63Z7jY98/30CNX/NaE im+BfVwgcDogF3e9Cx8Q7TPx/K/fZ+UsaeqYDfNE7sLdRVaGmffVqwz+CynaZ0oD5Lw3bToEqSm Dx1CZ0qQiUqgvBUFUDwNakGbUKNlOY0uFdPXUM5SAphtkUXoaLzutTz14s8pIuInLnud6sDaOBW aEqUPGKofXa4f40fCVCHlgT24MfuDPJ3sg13mJ+5CGMbmjumUmRKFhwukYf3mo6V0TE8Jo/qsDm wM7TYMVNcQeUmhVtMqhZrv4f7cO7uADNYt2hb2L4+sB3yBscmdNwtHz5PMSldy/WArfXVlhEzI3 +mkzif+SqCGxR8AwaIynt0AlklqkfRhdidsajMURSScn+QSXlkMvWAuahr8mI+faDiwdhpheV+c rsE6IQP90fJP9eHt
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/5Js98whvapfCRJmm-yoUQOQ-wek>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 16:29:52 -0000

Hi Pavan, WG,

 

I just posted -17 which includes the proposed text on RSVP-TE and BIER-TE from Dhruv with some tweaking by me.

 

Waiting to see whether Don (or anyone else) wishes to propose text to address Don’s points. At this time “we are all authors”. I am just the editor and will edit in new text if supplied, but I will not craft the new text from scratch. 

 

Failure to supply (or at least, failure to promise to supply) text sounds like lack of strong desire.

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: 27 June 2022 17:01
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-16

 

All


     The WG LC is closed.

Authors,

     Please continue the discussion on the comments/suggestions received from Don and Dhruv during the LC. Once resolved, please let the WG know about the changes (if any) and state the document is ready for publication to be requested.

Thank you!

-Pavan

 

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:28 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com> > wrote:

Thanks to everyone who reviewed and sent in their comments!

 

We are extending the last call to June 24th to allow for a few more reviews.

 

Regards,

-Pavan

 

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:51 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com> > wrote:

All,

This starts working group last call on

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis/


Given the size of the document, this will be an extended
LC (3 weeks). The working group last call ends on June 14th.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

Thank you,
Pavan (Co-Chair & Doc Shepherd)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email