[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Wed, 17 August 2016 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9F712D615 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mgx3m7hzjaM8 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B838F12D608 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2689; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471465500; x=1472675100; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=BBKmAt5GbG2s5gQGpynhv1G3snd4G17O47nf2cJO644=; b=NpiJbYaK9kg87dH7ebC1D66DP9kfE/G2QNy1sgx5Uh4rXCu3AWGuK0qI OwS6ZxZ3rf+O1HaClAi4Pp3grX1SOi9CjNkl+O/SvmdXJCf2hUjn+z+MB 9rvEN7Lv1VJ4eTVhw98AUm6iiqXy0hdLebBDWpZLbb3K53rgI53aL7IBh U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B/AgB+x7RX/5pdJa1eg0NWfAe3S4F9J?= =?us-ascii?q?IV5AoFsOBQCAQEBAQEBAV4nhF4BAQQBAQE4NAYFBQcEAgEIEQQBAQEeCQcnCxQ?= =?us-ascii?q?HAQEFAwIEDgUIiCEIDr1JAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIYqhE2EEhEBh?= =?us-ascii?q?XcFmUQBhh+Id4FyToQOiQKMO4N3AR42g3puAYV3N38BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,535,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="311422225"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Aug 2016 20:24:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7HKOxYY009261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:24:59 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:24:59 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:24:59 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
Thread-Index: AQHRzhXfT6q3G6X/LUGgia76AnTIrqA3hKJAgBairwD//8dQwA==
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:24:58 +0000
Message-ID: <b10d8b908a8544ec99cd2400edb06b31@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <9853f7ca-795a-4261-5e3c-c95ecd4a9a98@labn.net> <da7b7a5c0d5d4702b6a02d6393efe25d@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <C46D0183-7A00-4188-A9B7-0D5974337DEB@infinera.com>
In-Reply-To: <C46D0183-7A00-4188-A9B7-0D5974337DEB@infinera.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.252.147]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/8rqRv2YlRWH4C3s5ui-AhEIoS9c>
Cc: "Matt Hartley \(mhartley\)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:25:05 -0000


-----Original Message-----
From: Anurag Sharma [mailto:AnSharma@infinera.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 2:48 PM
To: Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>
Cc: draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks
Anurag

> On Aug 3, 2016, at 7:09 AM, Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Authors,
> 
> We're almost done with this IPR poll... just waiting on Anurag, who hasn't responded yet.
> 
> Does anyone know how to get in touch?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>> 
>> As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
>> 
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>> 
>> Please state either:
>> 
>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>> 
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>> 
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>> 
>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>> 
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
>> appropriate.
>> 
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer 
>> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not 
>> you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to 
>> the next stage until a response has been received from each author 
>> and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN 
>> THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>> 
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
>> listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations 
>> under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if 
>> you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain 
>> from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your 
>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed 
>> above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> TEAS WG Chairs
>> 
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
>> response.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list
>> Teas@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas