Re: [Teas] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 March 2021 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543E63A0B72; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 02:10:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pj-YqgVXaOr5; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 02:10:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E83153A0B70; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 02:09:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id e2so20812685ilu.0; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:09:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O91SXf63pej4Zj6/aacjPP4cADFtgg4SnpfsRfLsUig=; b=ODmNco4aZ1GbSOgii1nd6RzEmQvjlhN1JA1ve7qhhtu6MlJyb6V7fNTi7LY6mEtOeh YPS7rAyeC4ybD9Tr5Y9BKWPz6EJkfw28Xn+G+jVAzgcuXqiFvhFFRYDCmXu8XC3fr/oE mKTjZJWP6jNBQyD8C4pibGwSsrgEfmmJmbNPAxcpxTBd7ytwE04hhV5/+yNtRnjCq4fB rZCD7QUfEhY3KeCGPfOca5VEesOjEXBjAm8tSuVxqvO0TQxpT06fFeNmK9QXbmjBOOeR yYP+1uV0ZASJMfSBDIbRTPpO6i+dOHzk9+rYu4lVQKqsZIrP2ZgxiZBw3shm25ydiOLd jcUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O91SXf63pej4Zj6/aacjPP4cADFtgg4SnpfsRfLsUig=; b=OovN7oxfe5pCpOU4nlq0XjX5U7BqQLgUT4F/t3CJZ3EKG7AS2Fn6sWKJLxX0/OCewh 4TvG+E3Y0ofqbsrT9dRVjVaGlJabO4mJxWOSyF5H6VNM82sC5tLcah+N8mo/ljYBxkoJ /7DsRVpBr18jA0yN25a+ZwUeIpQU/SYE1SzHVlmr9/WZxuRMFh+7GVJDNz9GC62ofL5q GszRDHKRKjJ7L4EL2CSYzXmjcuS+gNdDlzsFSOXuTrvrc9wLBsH/IiJpnCJsZ5Disslv CDGhCeWKU6VCmcMmEVyL/qmfo+dKEjFYL4uvg2JMTKvJwHjgaN8Zq1ItmODQwvS98p/3 oQFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KPQahBJVwG4ixnPknchx/yIjRQ+flkHQFPje5qps/9GoVmBqc rSmC4ULFkLGrH5m9ZWf+kLV6gIeUWJCMotWgCmSTNoPVtG4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz48YTX4kzDdypTyHXeAzE3gRl24Hw/PEpZUoJvN3R0A7K4XP18YFeIqwPz7GUFwkf9kLay380yrT3dJjXw42w=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:12a1:: with SMTP id f1mr20824332ilr.124.1614766196275; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:09:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A31F6308-B1A4-4CD7-AC71-BB6722CAC1A7@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <A31F6308-B1A4-4CD7-AC71-BB6722CAC1A7@chopps.org>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:39:20 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6DydowRwgu6PsXFcPM9_ctx7Gvdmcu1CFrFQ5_Q3BJEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, teas-ads@ietf.org, "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/CiQCIy2kwOIGU_6IJgetAfD6TQw>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 10:10:01 -0000

Hi,

I went through the diff with RFC5316. The changes look good. Some
minor comments -

(1) Is it wise to use normative keywords MUST and SHOULD in the
appendix? The text is from section 3.1 but can it be reworded in the
appendix? Also wondering if other changes (IANA, nits) could be listed
or we could call it "major change" :)

(2) IPv6 Local ASBR ID and IPv6 Router ID is used interchangeably i.e.
table in IANA section 6.2 does not use the same name as the table in
section 3.1

Hope this helps!

Thanks!

Dhruv



On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:00 PM Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
>
> Hi LSR and TEAS,
>
> This begins a joint WG last call for:
>
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/
>
> Please discuss any issues on the LSR mailing list. The WGLC will end March 3, 2021.
>
> Authors, please indicate wether you are aware of any IPR related to this document to the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris, Acee, (Lou and Pavan).
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas