Re: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05

Adrian Farrel <> Fri, 05 February 2021 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870073A0BB8; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:29:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.915
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QaJLtrGqyPT; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C0A3A0B9E; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 115ASwYE016868; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:58 GMT
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB452203D; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 172A82203A; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ( [] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 115ASuka007558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:57 GMT
Reply-To: <>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <>
To: "'Vishnu Pavan Beeram'" <>, "'TEAS WG'" <>
Cc: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:56 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <013c01d6fba9$b618ed20$224ac760$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_013D_01D6FBA9.B6198960"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIsQedEQcbBE6vdDTIoWQfnLCFB9qmezrjg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--20.971-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--20.971-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--20.970600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Jm7Yxmmj9OnxIbpQ8BhdbLIGMNfiwa5NIiTd2l7lf6HkOOZ1bT6psWFW dNcmmUzi2pG5Z1zbD4QrySg2QcGzB55KIPG1A5EN4tu9fANDPbkKF0jiwuWuOLasXQUyGDaEXzw oVYXbtz7RNqlAfG4E9F8IV87+8KunNI6Zse83SgflCjTeYR3AAUjEWwwu715stXl9IxEPXOrP6y uf4c2Uy+SXT/ru9uRZTYP229Ekev7JMGDPqGXR1/rNPkGWAHDfHA5wH3/21xG6pZ/o2Hu2YXzK3 Q9zSFL7F+/GJ/FbO+/Jj6pwifw6c3//aC4gn5TY/Sl5cYQQGW8O8pJojG7qSlcbfIj2Ta9sh80v sP8cwQ4odYefEiLfeYPbw023vELIKQF5X/V3WxnfSQNpZkETVNBO21OxlsovBxHTXJpH4UFdH+G f7hAirVWeA27U+g5dZCybxq9uXHMsMLcUZMcjd4vptQwz5tsi/3x8h/jAheUGdESBpKa8wixZV2 XdhwOwjyXC7yPnZ4gUAF4uBmvRkR8TzIzimOwPgxsfzkNRlfIDOZGFGsyhFbDszp3K5gqDiuuVO WrUWfnHqZD2Bxx5pqjr1bIs3Ngl3YtlkHIdwArXcMY1wgSoSg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:29:05 -0000

Hi Pavan, others,


I agree with the three points that Luis makes about this draft, and I think it will need a good deal of future work, but I don’t agree with Luis’s conclusion.


It seems to me that this document is a good enough starting point for the WG. We seem to have agreed that the WG should have a framework that addresses network slicing, and this is definitely advanced enough and consistent with the terminology work such that the WG can start to shape the text once the draft is adopted.


I hope we can speedily adopt the draft and then move on to list and resolve the issues that we have.





From: Teas <> On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: 04 February 2021 13:43
To: TEAS WG <>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <>
Subject: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05



This is start of a *two* week poll on making
draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05 a TEAS working group document. Please
send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".
If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If
yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see
addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends February 18th.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou