IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] Rewritten charter was Re: Further ballot positions was Re: Éric Vyncke's Abstain on charter-ietf-term-00-03: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 12 April 2021 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1653A170E; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 03:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BsfMOfjuPsL; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 03:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E2E3A1706; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 03:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:8430:ee31:d2a:d1fd] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:8430:ee31:d2a:d1fd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E6A660032E; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:23:42 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1618223022; bh=IZz3aLAFygiPUsEEKYarg/fbl2jlXEP9ltRQ5v4TtKQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=vapLPXCgoonTD2UaH1rOhfyknnv1bt8KN5TZUgjwwhvns8e9fNvUTPDOzg3YWCQaP QwhEF/EVx/vqPlhA/O+mKa0sZYiAq+RHlv6Ohz83ExwoloqFuFbW++6ecod+0j9dn+ aOnM6M3J+7QDsyCjElXsWBg7Dya4J2bVNnhSX0+s=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <4C5373A6-C7BC-4080-ACFA-E9F172197088@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CF5AC9AA-6D83-4291-AFBE-54B513483B49"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:23:41 +0300
In-Reply-To: <C7E700B9-EBE8-4C1E-9F8E-637BA352E4C5@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, terminology@ietf.org
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <8EAB25AC-4139-467A-BE0D-F13F6785857D@eggert.org> <C7E700B9-EBE8-4C1E-9F8E-637BA352E4C5@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-MailScanner-ID: 9E6A660032E.A1D4E
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/6ECy55q0OH1BMJL9hURLUFS6QyM>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Rewritten charter was Re: Further ballot positions was Re: Éric Vyncke's Abstain on charter-ietf-term-00-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:23:56 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-4-12, at 13:13, Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I see that you've just issued a rewritten -04 of the TERM charter, too.
> Can notifications to this list please be turned back on.

I did email a notification to terminology@ietf.org?

The datatracker doesn't currently seem to do this when a group charter is updated, and there doesn't seem to be an option to make it do so that I see. So this is not something that was either turned off or can be turned on without a code change. I opened https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/3254.

(This is unrelated to some AD ballot emails not having been sent to this list, which is up to the commenting AD to enable or disable when they comment.)

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email