Re: [Terminology] Further ballot positions was Re: Éric Vyncke's Abstain on charter-ietf-term-00-03: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 12 April 2021 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597B23A0BD3; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYm-UEeaDawx; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194A53A0CFE; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:8430:ee31:d2a:d1fd] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:8430:ee31:d2a:d1fd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5B7860032E; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:03:07 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1618210987; bh=+JDbYeFk1DtoAxusHtSzwGfb8n9lEqw+t/FyDuNt3W4=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=nbKsZCNhclguJ5Q41kcY07QG7oWhmuFMB8h1BBKNM/O9g95z76UJz9S0f7fMApVtk HC2Sxgqk5NTukzswkS+1YM2fv7enomtb7f/KdjH4p/lG902pz2bzZdjHjvtSCJ2Ja4 uZHXYnKsBHrGCcuw1Q5KWzH69RHaBipf8aG46Guo=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <2B967468-4D17-4080-91A9-A7A2732159E9@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_391805F6-3647-4F48-AD49-8708D5617940"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:03:07 +0300
In-Reply-To: <8EAB25AC-4139-467A-BE0D-F13F6785857D@eggert.org>
Cc: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, terminology@ietf.org
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <161788820112.1280.17523864160155265348@ietfa.amsl.com> <AA198A8F-EB0A-464E-B711-027D724AE47C@yahoo.co.uk> <8EAB25AC-4139-467A-BE0D-F13F6785857D@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-MailScanner-ID: A5B7860032E.A2B8F
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/emo6lpJYjhi6AY5if4aO3lBuY5U>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Further ballot positions was Re: Éric Vyncke's Abstain on charter-ietf-term-00-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:03:54 -0000

On 2021-4-12, at 10:00, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> The alias will either go to me or the secretariat, I think.

Well, apparently not:

>                   The mail system
> 
> <term-chairs@ietf.org>: host mail.ietf.org[4.31.198.44] said: 550 5.1.1
>    <term-chairs@ietf.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual
>    alias table (in reply to RCPT TO command)

This isn't ideal.

Thanks,
Lars