IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] Terminology draft revised

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 29 October 2021 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6095F3A1248; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FQS7XLIGoC6w; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 065103A1243; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19TDID1C016989; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:09:49 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=QlHgsbOcl/QIVqkIDS6530Wm37iXyuuomI4iIBq2pWY=; b=IYmLtcQReAe8Pre62k3RaxyzDiBtWLgG6VguOa7d+RXmOn7KuChwlZLv+tNeDoMHiuTl Knb5mIeebP+NfzQr4QrTUXp6Ixrw/gen14x8O1mnqqMdXZ+P2FNoU+YJUcTu3e401wHo 3fXRMmIGeRdgSt3qx8LcY+ed1DygnIV0MtdnIrmN2yVpKBuQUTZEDjfYYUDXcptHsM3U KEoWRfnpn97L1Z+pZgkuHR9GRQXl5kto1jy6H7OGDuVJf7IdIwtdngxPXSuT0k5E1/zi 4fNO+t7LVFxT/XHqLrcXROH2APJJ/EBoK9W8sK5earPhkah8BbwO3e2ZJJNcIAYAh1in CA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 3c00ay8bgb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:09:49 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19TE4TAJ027303; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:09:48 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3c0de08dk8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:09:48 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.24; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:09:47 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.024; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:09:47 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Terminology] Terminology draft revised
Thread-Index: AQHXzGgrOloQTuUcbkKjyk3okGrW3KvqBHAA
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:09:47 +0000
Message-ID: <C7584B81-EA1F-41DE-B800-92D62EB09BA5@akamai.com>
References: <543874247.3601661.1635472560876.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <543874247.3601661.1635472560876@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <543874247.3601661.1635472560876@mail.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5886928EDDB4D64DA318121F8FBE7B39@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-29_03:2021-10-29, 2021-10-29 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=689 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2110290083
X-Proofpoint-GUID: RodERbDUNlfjQ-fHMdkJ0StComwMVyzo
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RodERbDUNlfjQ-fHMdkJ0StComwMVyzo
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-29_03,2021-10-29_01,2020-04-07_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=656 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2110290083
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/Yl-mt7pVR9j_lOzo2yuRLjC1k4c>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Terminology draft revised
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:09:58 -0000

> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-terminology/07/

>    released 22 October, is still pushing for independent submission.

Actually, it also says "Response to review needed"

If you have comments on it, the place to post them is not this list, but rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org  I did.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email