IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [therightkey] Non-WG forming BoF

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 29 October 2012 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F4E21F8540 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 894bqNRQ43dg for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F05921F8510 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85D1C786; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:11:15 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w5HACjSdgPB2; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:11:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.4] (unknown [86.42.183.189]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 370FCC77B; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:11:15 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <508ED4D3.8050508@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:11:15 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121017 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <508AB760.7050803@cs.tcd.ie> <508E61C9.2060001@comodo.com> <CABrd9SQyPkbBF28tetzVRD6sy4E6aMd7AJPXajntEmRadfKb5g@mail.gmail.com> <508E65E8.1010906@comodo.com> <508E6F4A.20809@cs.tcd.ie> <CABrd9SSko2SdwPFCxJ2jsBWy8i4ny1AJ4EEHD59m9nvqG1oxTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgqmFsCm83QQVkXazcnjAbStjvq6BqfhBU_Qu=Q-VMZiA@mail.gmail.com> <AE8331F0-8DD2-4F27-9DAE-BEA5969BA992@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <AE8331F0-8DD2-4F27-9DAE-BEA5969BA992@vpnc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] Non-WG forming BoF
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:11:43 -0000

On 10/29/2012 07:02 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Until that changes, there is really no "we" for doing anything: the proposal about individual submission or independent submission documents. Stephen's question about number of documents was for the current authors, not for a pre-WG (unless he has changed his mind without telling me...).

I tell you everything:-)

I'm interested in folks' opinions generally though. Reason
for that is to help evaluate the feasibility of the option
of just AD sponsoring a single draft. If there were a
justifiable widespread opinion that >1 doc is needed that
doesn't fit any current WG then that sort of takes the AD
sponsoring route off the table.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email