IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS1.3

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 11 February 2013 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB69521F8856 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:24:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVwtdZBfSoLN for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B3021F8849 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9759A9A400E; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:24:50 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBHL-hcL7mM4; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:24:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [172.26.32.175] (65-123-3-106.dia.static.qwest.net [65.123.3.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CF09A4027; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:23:36 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <AAE0766F5AF36B46BAB7E0EFB9273206194A67DCDF@GBTWK10E001.Technology.local>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:02:14 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4C4B9FB4-64EB-4D32-B914-FFD0F251E1BF@vigilsec.com>
References: <AAE0766F5AF36B46BAB7E0EFB9273206194A67DCDC@GBTWK10E001.Technology.local> <B132B06E59C4A540A03C3393F53BC07C408169C0@EXCH-MB01.cc.rhul.local> <AAE0766F5AF36B46BAB7E0EFB9273206194A67DCDE@GBTWK10E001.Technology.local> <B132B06E59C4A540A03C3393F53BC07C40818C02@EXCH-MB01.cc.rhul.local> <AAE0766F5AF36B46BAB7E0EFB9273206194A67DCDF@GBTWK10E001.Technology.local>
To: "Lewis, Nick" <nick.lewis@usa.g4s.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:24:50 -0000

>> SHA-1 is still "acceptable" for applications not related to digital signature generation (see Table 9).
> 
> Oops Sorry I forgot that the boundary is "greater than or equal to" the 112bit security of SHA-1 rather than just "greater than"
> (It looks as if NSS have until 2030 before they need to support TLS1.2 with HMAC-SHA256)

No.  That is the date that we want to complete the migration, so support needed to be added 5 to 10 years prior to that.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email