Archive

I support adoption.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:36 PM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> At IETF 105, ekr presented cTLS (Compact TLS) [0][1][2] to both the TLS WG
> and the LAKE BOF, which is now a chartered WG [3].  After some discussions,
> the ADs suggested [4] that the TLS WG consider whether this draft be
> adopted as a TLS WG item. LAKE could then later specify/refer/adopt/profile
> it, as appropriate. The authors revised cTLS and presented the revised
> draft at IETF 106 [5].  At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of cTLS
> as a WG item.  To confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG
> should not adopt this as a WG item, then please let the chairs know by
> posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say
> why).
>
> NOTE:
> : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then
> this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions.  We would
> have gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is
> progressing out of the WG.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
>
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-105-tls-sessa-ctls/
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/
> [2] https://github.com/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/
> [4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/kACwW7PXrmTRa4PvXQ0TA34xCvk
> [5]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tls-compact-tls-13-00.pdf
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-ctls