Re: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-ctls

As a co-author of the document I am in favor of adopting it. I have started
on implementation work on top of Mbed TLS already and plan to continue doing
that work as it progresses through the IETF.

-----Original Message-----
From: TLS <tls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 1:36 PM
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-ctls

At IETF 105, ekr presented cTLS (Compact TLS) [0][1][2] to both the TLS WG
and the LAKE BOF, which is now a chartered WG [3].  After some discussions,
the ADs suggested [4] that the TLS WG consider whether this draft be adopted
as a TLS WG item. LAKE could then later specify/refer/adopt/profile it, as
appropriate. The authors revised cTLS and presented the revised draft at
IETF 106 [5].  At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of cTLS as a WG
item.  To confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG should
not adopt this as a WG item, then please let the chairs know by posting a
message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why).

NOTE:
: If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then
this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions.  We would
have gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is
progressing out of the WG.

Thanks,
Chris, Joe, and Sean

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-105-tls-sessa-ctls/
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/
[2] https://github.com/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/
[4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/kACwW7PXrmTRa4PvXQ0TA34xCvk
[5]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tls-compact-tl
s-13-00.pdf
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls