Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@gnutls.org> Sat, 12 June 2010 14:10 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=epU2vMZCp0JtF/JsomBvIGhRQYq7XbpEKzs3nDtpgNMZgLZGU3qcpXIl/XgKjrOJya hgBCVDEaege4HJX64qNtgQZ4OiDW1+a5RsVM1ayDU4G9iRV1BJvKHd0xP4r6CTgkash1 fcM1lKbqc0EuPJtiFwt1CyADfICV2xalT5qIA=
Sender: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n.mavrogiannopoulos@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C13953A.8040107@gnutls.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:10:02 +0200
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@gnutls.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
References: <20100612034512.CB07A3A687D@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100612034512.CB07A3A687D@core3.amsl.com>
OpenPGP: id=96865171
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tls@ietf.org, i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt
Precedence: list

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> 	Title           : Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions
> 	Author(s)       : D. Eastlake 3rd
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt
> 	Pages           : 31
> 	Date            : 2010-06-11
> 
> This document provides specifications for existing TLS extensions. It
> is a companion document for the TLS 1.2 specification [RFC5246]. The
> extensions specified are server_name, max_fragment_length,
> client_certificate_url, trusted_ca_keys, truncated_hmac, and
> status_request.

It has been mentioned before, but I think its worthwhile to bring it up
again. The "Maximum Fragment Length" extension only allows setting a
fragment length that is lower than 2^14... Why not allow larger sizes
than that?


regards,
Nikos

[TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-09.txt Internet-Drafts
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Peter Gutmann
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Martin Rex
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Blumenthal, Uri - 0668 - MITLL
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
[TLS] max_fragment_length values (was: RE: I-D Ac… Pasi.Eronen
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Donald Eastlake
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Martin Rex
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Peter Gutmann
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Juho Vähä-Herttua
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
[TLS] DTLS and large messages t.petch
Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Juho Vähä-Herttua
Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Michael Tüxen
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Blumenthal, Uri - 0668 - MITLL
Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages t.petch
Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Michael Tüxen
Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Pasi.Eronen
Re: [TLS] DTLS and large messages Michael Tüxen
Re: [TLS] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-0… Peter Gutmann