IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Call for acceptance of draft-moeller-tls-downgrade-scsv

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 31 January 2014 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729841A0367 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:46:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSPHMCcAuupj for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:46:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [209.135.209.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A561A035D for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:46:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7839A42D7; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:45:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tw0h32Cri2mk; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:45:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.100.238] (209-23-210-2-ip-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [209.23.210.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB59A9A42AD; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:45:28 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBP_-MUonYYsxgz2ZdokiEDVhx4mYq1a4BMayuGbbxb2Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:45:17 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FEDDEC3D-D8F7-4DC6-83D4-CD001DAA9B70@vigilsec.com>
References: <CABcZeBP_-MUonYYsxgz2ZdokiEDVhx4mYq1a4BMayuGbbxb2Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for acceptance of draft-moeller-tls-downgrade-scsv
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:46:04 -0000

I did not previously voice an opinion, but I think the TLS WG should adopt the document and push to WG Last Call very quickly.

Russ


On Jan 23, 2014, at 5:06 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:

> WG Members,
> 
> This message is a call for acceptance of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bmoeller-tls-downgrade-scsv-01
> 
> As a TLS WG item.
> 
> Please provide any comments on this action by Feb 7. Because
> there has been only modest discussion of this document, the
> chairs ask people who have already spoken in favor or against
> this document to re-register their opinion (feel free to just say
> +1 or -1 and point back to the archives.)
> 
> -Ekr
> [For the chairs]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email