IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Requesting working group adoption of draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design

"Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu> Fri, 21 February 2020 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=93209905c8=uri@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0076F1200C3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:31:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SS55dGdeZ5xd for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:31:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from llmx2.ll.mit.edu (LLMX2.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FED11200C1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LLE2K16-MBX01.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K16-MBX01.mitll.ad.local) by llmx2.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTPS id 01LMV3SY029164; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:31:03 -0500
From: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
CC: Watson Ladd <watson@cloudflare.com>, IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Requesting working group adoption of draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design
Thread-Index: AQHV6O1N434rvusUuUeVDrTm3f3GWagmfJsAgAACdQCAAAg3AIAAAX4AgAAA7gCAAAP8AIAAAXiA
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:02 +0000
Message-ID: <4466BCEA-E918-423B-B278-48FA7E64705B@ll.mit.edu>
References: <68fe1d57-6bce-d649-d93a-4736a376d782@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <68fe1d57-6bce-d649-d93a-4736a376d782@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-E0B71FCC-AF4C-44B2-B517-090DCB12F9ED"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-21_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002050000 definitions=main-2002210168
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/TYkhNFyxRedtaj_bdfIFB-KcDb0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Requesting working group adoption of draft-stebila-tls-hybrid-design
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:09 -0000

You may have a point regarding finishing this draft - but let's cross that bridge when we get there. :-)

Regards,
Uri

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 21, 2020, at 17:26, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 21/02/2020 22:11, Watson Ladd wrote:
>> 
>> https://blog.cloudflare.com/towards-post-quantum-cryptography-in-tls/
>> https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-tls-post-quantum-experiment/
>> 
>> This was also presented at the NIST standardization workshop in October of 2019.
> 
> Thanks. I read through [1]. It's fine work, but does not
> convince me that this draft is ready to be an RFC before
> the "winning" algs are known, as some have characteristics
> that are quite different from the two that were tested
> here. I maintain my position that adoption is fine but
> finishing this before NIST are done is not.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> [1]
> https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Presentations/measuring-tls-key-exchange-with-post-quantum-kem/images-media/sullivan-session-1-paper-pqc2019.pdf
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Ta,
>>> S.
> <0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email